On 24 March 2011 12:29, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote:
> The universal consciousness does not know it exists. Ah, I see RS has done it already... > > It is the temporary human mind which creates all evil and good and leaves > it as a tradition for the future generations. > But universal consciousness is like a platform for everything else. > For example, consider a tree. It has the same universal consciousness as > us. > But it does not have a mind or thoughts. but does it worry about falling over when nobody is listening??? Its basically in a state of deep sleep. > The body and mind are manifestations and there are hundreds of varieties of > animal and plants due to this. > Universal consciousness came first. Then came the brain. Not the other way > round. > The brain can sense this universal consciousness but it does sense any > quality because Universal Consciousness is itself the foundation of all > experience. > It is just like how Nisargadatta says " Can your tongue your own mouth ? " > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:20 PM, godszen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> if everyone was perceiving from a universal conscious >> point of view, then everyone would want to be productive >> for the good of society, but this is not the case, >> so opinions like "it's not fair that someone has more >> than me, and I want the fairness-police to confiscate >> some of their property and give it to me!" arise, without >> any consideration that maybe that person works >> 60 hrs a week, and you work much less or not at all! >> where's the work-police making sure everyone >> is productive? >> >> if everyone sits around demanding that someone else >> take care of them, who's going to do the work? >> >> On Mar 23, 4:23 am, "YouWho?" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > If you say so. >> > >> > I think the difference in our views is that I admit everything I say >> > is not true, >> > >> > and it seems that you truly believe that what you say IS true. >> > >> > What you are saying is that you are a protector (of mine), and not >> > surrendered to your own divinty (nothing's mine, all is thine). >> > >> > When Nisargadatta was asked about if he felt any resentment towards >> > the British rule, he said, "If I take a rupee note and take it from >> > this shirt pocket on the left side and put it into the shirt pocket on >> > the right side, have I lost anything?" There is deep meaning in this. >> > >> > You think you have something to lose, that's the main point. With this >> > thinking, you will always cling to the false sense of individuality. >> > >> > I have not ulterior motives in saying any of this to you. > > > -- *mark ty wharton* click the link and read GURU<http://www.myebook.com/index.php?option=ebook&id=12255> _____________________________________________________ ______________________________________ The contents of this email and the context of the message and any attachments are intended for the recipient only. You may not copy, or redistribute the contents of this email without the express, written consent of the author. *mark ty-wharton is a composer, philosophical speaker and writer* *http://mark.ty-wharton.com @mark_tywharton <http://twitter.com/mark_tywharton>*
