if everyone was perceiving from a universal conscious
point of view, then everyone would want to be productive
for the good of society, but this is not the case,
so opinions like "it's not fair that someone has more
than me, and I want the fairness-police to confiscate
some of their property and give it to me!" arise, without
any consideration that maybe that person works
60 hrs a week, and you work much less or not at all!
where's the work-police making sure everyone
is productive?

if everyone sits around demanding that someone else
take care of them, who's going to do the work?

On Mar 23, 4:23 am, "YouWho?" <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you say so.
>
> I think the difference in our views is that I admit everything I say
> is not true,
>
> and it seems that you truly believe that what you say IS true.
>
> What you are saying is that you are a protector (of mine), and not
> surrendered to your own divinty (nothing's mine, all is thine).
>
> When Nisargadatta was asked about if he felt any resentment towards
> the British rule, he said, "If I take a rupee note and take it from
> this shirt pocket on the left side and put it into the shirt pocket on
> the right side, have I lost anything?" There is deep meaning in this.
>
> You think you have something to lose, that's the main point. With this
> thinking, you will always cling to the false sense of individuality.
>
> I have not ulterior motives in saying any of this to you.

Reply via email to