>" My position is that words are, so to speak, inert ink on paper. 'To mean' is a verb. Words don't "mean", because they don't act". Cheerskep.
Word is coded information. If it is sensed it acts. Words have power. Words, body functions, science and art dictate the path of society. Not necessary in that order. Boris Shoshensky >> -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, Frances. Realize that if he takes it a premise that "meaning" and "meanings" are "objective entities in the outer world", my position will be that he is assuming the very question at hand. The huge majority of philosophers do that. They say, "Words MEAN," (or "Words have meanings"), and they take their question as, "How do they do it?" My position is that words are, so to speak, inert ink on paper. 'To mean' is a verb. Words don't "mean", because they don't act. The mind, contemplating a word, summons up previous ASSOCIATIONS with the sound or scription. The word 'carrots' was constantly associated with an experience of that vegetable, so when someone hears 'carrot' the image etc of the vegetable comes to mind. Understandably, we tend to say, "That's the word's meaning for me." Which implies it's solely notional. ************** Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car listings at AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851) _____________________________________________________________ Keep your home running smoothly with great home automation solutions! Click now! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2221/fc/Ioyw6i4t5g8K2uSnb9r1Cccpwkh1zt wjLW6N1CcbQvsKhW4ga6iT0w/
