You are right about the performing arts.  I recall the dean at NYU telling me 
that students in their film program must make a 30 minute film at their own 
cost to complete the program and the estimate (15 yrs. ago) was $50,000. That 
was a program known in academia as a "Hollywood" program, signifying a full 
scale type production.  Other programs are more experimental, relying on video, 
etc., still expensive but not as much as Hollywood programs. 

Miller wants a state run art school situation for new propaganda art made with 
time-tested exacting skills based on old Russian Socialist stuff and ancient 
Asian traditions. And how would his graduates fare in a wild west democracy?  
WC  


--- On Wed, 2/4/09, Michael Brady <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Michael Brady <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Tinkering with the System
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 9:32 AM
> William
> 
> > Thus there is little in the existing social structure
> or marketplace that would embrace the sort of art that most
> high quality art programs aim to foster.
> 
> I think this will be the "money shot" to Miller.
> Sit tight, William.
> 
> As for your comments about the performing arts, bear in
> mind that an important factor is cost. It takes a lot of
> money to put on a ballet, concert, or play. Not to mention a
> feature-length movie. Even one-person performances require a
> theater or auditorium and all the things that go with them.
> 
> Visual artists and writers labor alone and typically
> don't require a lot of capital (excluding the needs of
> the big metal sculptors).
> 
> Many years ago, I observed that the funding for the arts,
> via NEA grants and similar benefactors, offers full-time
> employment to a lot of administrative staff and very few
> artists. Notable among the artists who receive what amounts
> to full-time employment are symphony orchestras. Because the
> performers have to rehearse and travel together, they are
> paid a larger stipend or salary, compared to the typical $5K
> or $10K that *a few* painters receive as an outright grant,
> or, more often, for an "artist in the
> schools"-type of arrangement.
> 
> Things may have changed over the years and these remarks my
> not perfectly fit the situation, but I think it gets to the
> salient part.
> 
> Another thing: Democracy and capitalism are great
> "harrowers," turners over of the soil, which is
> the way to promote the new growth. It's the sabbatical
> and jubilee year of forgiving debts and starting over again.
> What once was first is now last. Cabanel's polished
> putti are now Cezanne's scumbled landscapes.
> 
> 
> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
> Michael Brady
> [email protected]

Reply via email to