>"This sounds more ad hominem than reasoned. Consequently it is not convincing." KAte sullivan
Louis Sullivan's position cannot be reasoned. Either one "hears" what a building has to say -- or one doesn't. Just as one distinguishes paintings by whether they feel "inevitable and resolved" ..... or one doesn't. What's interesting about William is his ambivalence about that distinction. He wants to make it -- especially with regard to his own "meaningless" work - but he realizes that it's marginal to the world of higher education where apparent complexity and paradox is given greater value. ____________________________________________________________ You can take it with you! Click here for a luxurious new motor home and travel in style! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxPbGwd3eHfomaTpQkxyelfXL pbn5828OLQBVKzfvOPumcEL2yE4ZS/
