I mean what you wrote, not what Louis Sullivan said and not what William said. Kate Sullivan In a message dated 6/8/09 10:33:21 AM, [email protected] writes:
> >"This sounds more ad hominem than reasoned. Consequently it is not > convincing." KAte sullivan > > > > > Louis Sullivan's position cannot be reasoned. > > Either one "hears" what a building has to say -- or one doesn't. > > Just as one distinguishes paintings by whether they feel "inevitable and > resolved" ..... or one doesn't. > > What's interesting about William is his ambivalence about that > distinction. > > He wants to make it -- especially with regard to his own "meaningless" > work - > but he realizes that it's marginal to the world of higher education where > apparent complexity and paradox is given greater value. > > > ____________________________________________________________ > You can take it with you! Click here for a luxurious new motor home and > travel > in style! > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxPbGwd3eHfomaTpQkxyelf > XL > pbn5828OLQBVKzfvOPumcEL2yE4ZS/ > > > ************** A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwol a.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585043x1201462775/aol?redir=http://www.freecredi treport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62& bcd=JunestepsfooterNO62)
