In a message dated 3/1/10 12:29:33 AM, [email protected] writes:
> I suppose I use the word "aesthetics" in the broadest all inclusive > sense, > not just as applied to art, but every way we sense anything. Is'nt that > what this is all about? > > Not for me. You've suggested this before, Mando -- that all sensation is aesthetic. It seems to me this quasi-pantheistic notion obliterates the distinction between aesthetic experience and all sorts of daily, hum-drum experiences like this very typing that I'm doing. Sure, you can probably point at aspects common to all, but I take the point of studying aesthetics to be to identify what is unique to aesthetic experience.
