On Aug 17, 2012, at 2:39 PM, William Conger <[email protected]> wrote:
> In a painting there are no empty spaces. There all spaces are shapes, some > filled in; some maybe not; some easily evoking a specific referent, some evoking > many or just a few ambiguously. Call 'nothing' anything you like but when you > say nothing without qualifying it you are are referring to a state of absolute > emptiness as in a vacuum...and I suppose even that is 'something', Which reminds me of the art school exercise. Draw a chair by drawing the negative spaces formed by the rungs, legs, etc. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Michael Brady
