I would have cost them just a penny or two to have coated the inside of the enclosure with aluminum deposition or nickel paint (or arc spray zinc) to have eliminated much of that.
I wonder what the difference would be to put foil on everything but the area in the front where the antenna is... From: Jeremy Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 10:43 AM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RF Armor for a CPE ....so it dropped from hearing at a -30 to a -36. Still too hot for them to both be on-channel obviously, since they put out so much noise out the back. Obviously a directional antenna like a Powerbeam will be different. On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: In my experience testing RF armor on a two Nanostations facing opposite directions, ten feet apart from each other, each rf armor lowered the noise level by 3db. So both of them lowered the level that they could hear each other by 6db. On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Jay Weekley <[email protected]> wrote: How effective is RF Armor in reducing interference being received by an SM? Obviously it depends on which direction it's coming from . -- Jay Weekley Cyber Broadband -- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
