I used to use galvanizing spray paint to repair stingers that had lost their gold stickers, and it worked great for that. I would clean the residue off, mask and spray the circle, and then paint the whole thing white.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:59 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Galvanizing spray paint may not have a good faraday effect due to the > small zinc particle size and the lack of electrical connection between > particles. Just a guess. I would think foil tape would tell you for > certain. > > But the paint may have been just as good. Never really tested it for > that. I know that eventually the vehicle somehow weathers or evaporates > away and allows the zinc to do the proper electrochemistry when applied to > steel. > > *From:* Jeremy > *Sent:* Friday, July 27, 2018 10:55 AM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RF Armor for a CPE > > I have masked the front and painted the backs with galvanizing spray > paint, but the difference was not really very noticeable. I debated trying > foil tape, but just gave up frequency reuse on that old UBNT gear. > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:47 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I would have cost them just a penny or two to have coated the inside of >> the enclosure with aluminum deposition or nickel paint (or arc spray zinc) >> to have eliminated much of that. >> >> I wonder what the difference would be to put foil on everything but the >> area in the front where the antenna is... >> >> *From:* Jeremy >> *Sent:* Friday, July 27, 2018 10:43 AM >> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RF Armor for a CPE >> >> ....so it dropped from hearing at a -30 to a -36. Still too hot for them >> to both be on-channel obviously, since they put out so much noise out the >> back. Obviously a directional antenna like a Powerbeam will be different. >> >> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> In my experience testing RF armor on a two Nanostations facing opposite >>> directions, ten feet apart from each other, each rf armor lowered the noise >>> level by 3db. So both of them lowered the level that they could hear each >>> other by 6db. >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Jay Weekley <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> How effective is RF Armor in reducing interference being received by an >>>> SM? Obviously it depends on which direction it's coming from . >>>> -- >>>> *Jay Weekley* >>>> >>>> *Cyber Broadband * >>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------ >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> > > ------------------------------ > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
