PTP550 is just coming out, the software isn't even done. If you only need ~2 mbps I'd go with a pair of Force 200 radios. 25dbi dishes enough? Set them in eptp mode and you'll be done.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: > I ment 670, said 650... it's Friday and I'm ready for a beer. > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> EOL means it should get cheaper. :-) >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >> >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Eric Muehleisen" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Friday, August 17, 2018 12:52:48 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Cambium PTP400 replacement >> >> >> The 650 is EOL. Go with the 670 and you can use it in multipoint mode and >> save on radio costs. >> >> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:34 AM Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I wouldn't put up a AC EPMP/PTP550 and expect it to be trouble free >>> yet... the firmware is still being ironed out. Tried and true would >>> probably be PTP650/PTP450 like Colin said. >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Sam Lambie <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> If bandwidth isn't an issue, I have a whole bunch of PTP 100's laying >>>> around. Cheap.... >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 9:55 AM Lewis Bergman <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Huh. So the only real difference I need isn't available. Figures. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:22 AM [email protected] < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The PTP550 has two radios in it that you can bond together. The DSO >>>>>> ability hasn't been released in firmware. >>>>>> When the DSO is operational, it will only change one channel at a >>>>>> time so the link never goes down. You can also set >>>>>> the channel width separately for each radio. Another note is that >>>>>> these radios have not yet been approved for DFS >>>>>> frequencies, so that will be another firmware upgrade to enable that. >>>>>> About 5ms latency. Another feature in future >>>>>> firmware will be GPS sync from a CMM5. (Or Packetflux I'm sure) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Lewis Bergman < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> So I have a customer with a private PTP network built long ago, >>>>>>> obviously, with PTP400 links. For years this has worked great and they >>>>>>> have >>>>>>> been happy. Recently, due to either lightening or another contractor >>>>>>> issue, >>>>>>> one of the three sites (2 of the the total 6 backhauls) are now dead. I >>>>>>> could probably find some ancient stuff and maybe replace these two but I >>>>>>> thought now would be a good time to get them into some supportable >>>>>>> equipment. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would like something as trouble free as the PTP400. Throughput is >>>>>>> a non issue as they only need about 2Mbs. The main deal is reliability >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> my desire to not have to jack with the thing due to outside influences >>>>>>> be >>>>>>> they weather or interference. Basically as close to the 400's trouble >>>>>>> free >>>>>>> operation as possible. Cost is a factor but not the primary one, yet >>>>>>> something above $1000 each side is a non starter. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have looked at the PTP550 which is based on an AC chipset but says >>>>>>> it has: >>>>>>> Dynamic Spectrum Optimization (DSO)* With Dynamic Spectrum >>>>>>> Optimization, PTP 550 systems are constantly optimizing the channel of >>>>>>> operation to maximize link reliability and performance. Based on >>>>>>> environment the PTP 550 can be set to move or search better spectrum. >>>>>>> As a >>>>>>> result, customer can get more throughput with limited spectrum in even >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> most challenging environments >>>>>>> I also looked at the ePMP Force series, based on the same chipset. I >>>>>>> have used a bunch of these before but not in this demanding (reliability >>>>>>> wise) environment. All the Force stuff seem to have a sentence like >>>>>>> these: >>>>>>> Configurable modes of operation ensure robust adaptivity to both >>>>>>> symmetrical and asymmetrical traffic while providing high performance >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> round-trip latency as low as 3-5 ms. >>>>>>> Configurable Modes of operation ensure robust adaptivity to both >>>>>>> symmetrical and asymmetrical traffic while providing high performance >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> round-trip latency as low as 2 - 3 ms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So I guess my question is, for those using these products, is there >>>>>>> really a big difference between the PTP550 line and the Force line? They >>>>>>> are both based on the AC chipset so while there is maybe quite a bit >>>>>>> they >>>>>>> can do to enhance that I can't imagine it would be earth shattering. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any recommendations? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> *Sam Lambie* >>>> Taosnet Wireless Tech. >>>> 575-758-7598 Office >>>> www.Taosnet.com <http://www.newmex.com> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
