How does water enter the unit through the Ethernet port? The Ethernet port is about the lowest part of the unit and would require water to flow upwards.
> On Sep 17, 2018, at 16:53, Mike Meluskey <[email protected]> wrote: > > Water entering the units, primarily through the Ethernet ports. > $5 worth of gasket material would have engineered it correctly. > > On 17 Sep 2018, at 19:43, Mike Hammett wrote: > > What kind of failures? > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > > > > From: "Mike Meluskey" <[email protected]> > To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 6:34:13 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF subscription notification > > I was one of Ubiquiti’s first customers, their SR wireless cards that > plugged into MT RB532. > The lawsuit combined with the AF24’s 95% failure rate in the > Hurricanes (compared to the 0% failure of Ceragon IP-20 and 5% Cambium > 450m) have put Ubiquiti on our former vendor list. > > On 17 Sep 2018, at 18:14, Robert Andrews wrote: > > > +100 > > > > On 09/17/2018 02:36 PM, Sean Heskett wrote: > >> Being as Ubiquiti has decided to go down the frivolous lawsuit path > >> as their business model i've decided to never use any Ubiquiti > >> products or services in my business model. > >> > >> The only way for me to change my business model to include Ubiquiti > >> would be for them to change their business model. > >> > >> Suing your customers and inflicting our industry with harm puts you > >> outside of my vendor list. > >> > >> Also saying "but if you want to talk about products or anything other > >> than the lawsuit, feel free to reach out to me privately." is kind of > >> like Ford in the 1970's saying "if you want to talk about anything > >> else besides exploding Pintos, feel free to reach out to me > >> privately." The lawsuit is both a symptom and a cause to problems at > >> Ubiquiti and you can't just brush the elephant in the room under the > >> rug. > >> > >> 2 cents > >> > >> -Sean > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 9:28 AM Cameron Crum <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > >> In the interest of full disclosure, for those that don't know, > >> and > >> given the current environment, when I joined the group I had my > >> own > >> company (still do, just not doing much with it currently), but > >> now > >> also work for ubnt although I am not here to shill for them nor > >> will > >> I involve myself in discussions about them unless I see something > >> grossly in error. I would actually rather keep that side of > >> things > >> separate from this group as I value the relationships here above > >> any > >> employment scenario. My job at ubnt is actually to engage with > >> operators and try to find a better way to create and maintain > >> relationships with them. I hope to take all the past failures and > >> criticisms and present them with a plan on how to be better at > >> that > >> side of things. I actually prefer to hear the bad stuff as that > >> is > >> what I can use to help change things, hopefully. I don't want > >> this > >> to turn into a discussion about the company, but if you want to > >> talk > >> about products or anything other than the lawsuit, feel free to > >> reach out to me privately. I just don't want to seem like the > >> enemy > >> lurker. > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> Cameron > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Bill Prince > >> <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > >> Likewise. I hope that he is lurking in incognito mode at > >> least. > >> > >> > >> bp > >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > >> > >> On 9/15/2018 8:44 AM, Jason McKemie wrote: > >>> Yes, he is missed. > >>> > >>> On Saturday, September 15, 2018, <[email protected] > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Harass, welcome. > >>> I hope for the day to see Ken Hohof show up. > >>> *From:* Mathew Howard > >>> *Sent:* Friday, September 14, 2018 5:58 PM > >>> *To:* AFMUG > >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AF subscription notification > >>> Well, it would only be new lurkers that would get outed, > >>> I > >>> assume... but yeah, if all we're seeing is an email > >>> address, that can be pretty anonymous anyway. > >>> I'm not sure what good it would really do us though... > >>> other than give us an opportunity to harass new people. > >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 4:11 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Probably best to not out the lurkers. There are > >>> about > >>> 500 list members but only about 10% post. > >>> *From:* Mathew Howard > >>> *Sent:* Friday, September 14, 2018 3:03 PM > >>> *To:* AFMUG > >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AF subscription notification > >>> I assume most of the subscribers to this list never > >>> actually post anything. It might be kind of > >>> interesting to see who's watching us... > >>> I imagine there are some people that wouldn't like > >>> it, > >>> but if they aren't going to every post anything > >>> anyway, do we care? > >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:52 PM David Coudron > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> I think enough information is shared feely in > >>> this > >>> group to warrant folks being identified as > >>> recipients of the information. If I were signing > >>> up, I don’t think it would be unreasonable to > >>> be > >>> identified as being a part of the list given the > >>> value of the discussions on the list. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> David Coudron > >>> > >>> *From:*AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf > >>> Of > >>> *Adam Moffett > >>> *Sent:* Friday, September 14, 2018 3:34 PM > >>> *To:* [email protected] > >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AF subscription > >>> notification > >>> > >>> A manufacturer rep might prefer to quietly lurk > >>> and observe....or a government rep. > >>> > >>> Nobody is entitled to//privacy in a public > >>> forum, > >>> but I'm sure some would prefer it. > >>> > >>> -Adam > >>> > >>> On 9/14/2018 1:53 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >>> > >>> [email protected] has been successfully > >>> subscribed to AF. > >>> > >>> I am thinking of posting this when new > >>> people > >>> join. > >>> > >>> Or do new list subscribers deserve to remain > >>> incognito until they out themselves? > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> AF mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> -- > >>> AF mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >>> -- > >>> AF mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> -- > >>> AF mailing list > >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> AF mailing list > >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >> > >> > >> -- > >> AF mailing list > >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > AF mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
