80 Mbps at 80 miles?

From: Jason McKemie 
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 6:21 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DC+ Fiber

LTE does a whole lot better than WiMax in the face of interference, for 
whatever that is worth (not much).  

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:59 PM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:

  I’m not sure a 5 GHz LTE product makes sense, unless you’re talking carrier 
aggregation and LAA.  Otherwise I question the “magic” of “LTE modulation”, 
once you try to use it in dirty spectrum.  Oooooh, 256QAM.  Like we haven’t 
been doing that for years.  I put it in the same category as “3.65 GHz goes 
through trees”.  Only if the noise floor is really low, and then it’s not the 
“S” part of SNR, it’s the “N” part that’s magic.



  Maybe I’m missing something, but I’m not wanting to spend big bucks (and a 
big power budget) to use LTE in 5 GHz.  Maybe if there’s some killer antenna 
technology, but I think that’s what Medusa does too.  Not that it is any better 
on price or power consumption.





  From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ryan Ray
  Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 6:44 PM
  To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DC+ Fiber



  This would be better on the price front then if that is possible.





  On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Jon Langeler <[email protected]> 
wrote:

    Baicells just announced 5Ghz LTE, might be others.



    The brains of the Cambium 3G Medusa is apparently supposed to be capable of 
LTE modulation is what I thought I heard at the roadshow. It would be a future 
software option. 

    Jon Langeler

    Michwave Technologies, Inc.




    On Sep 24, 2018, at 6:12 PM, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote:

      I really have not been paying any attention to this, but is there an 
unlicensed LTE radio?

      Meaning an unlicensed radio that uses LTE modulation methods.  



      From: Adam Moffett 

      Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 4:09 PM

      To: [email protected] 

      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DC+ Fiber



      What's nice LTE?  Baicells?
      A Telrad eNB might be "only" $7k, but you'll be north of $9k by the time 
you figure out all the licenses you need.

      I'd be curious about a 3.65 Medusa, but I wonder if I can set TDD 
parameters that will line up with our existing LTE frames.
      -Adam




      On 9/24/2018 3:45 PM, Ryan Ray wrote:

        It's gonna be on display in Vegas. I'm not even in USA so the CBRS 
stuff isn't really affecting us right now, but when you start looking at 9k per 
ap you could get some nice LTE instead.  



        It's just surprising being 2k more than the 5ghz pmp450m. Especially 
with the cost of the SM being higher as well, but maybe the 450b 3.65 will 
solve that? Time will tell I guess.





        On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:

          That’s not surprising, if it includes the MU-MIMO activation key.  I 
guess nutty is in the eye of the beholder.



          But if it’s really available “soon”, I’m a little surprised, I was 
afraid they would wait to see what the FCC did with the PAL auction rules.  
Also whether the industry decided that CBRS is only for LTE devices, even for 
fixed.



          And I thought Ubiquiti had trademarked the term SOON™.



          Anyway, I think something like LTE or cnMedusa is going to be 
necessary for CBRS, especially with the cost of paying a SAS vendor for each 
location and the cost of acquiring PAL licenses, and then only getting 10 MHz 
channels.  You don’t get much capacity from 10 MHz of spectrum unless you have 
all the fancy tricks like beam steering and bidirectional MU-MIMO, and of 
course at least 256QAM.



          From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ryan Ray
          Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 1:31 PM
          To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>

          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DC+ Fiber



          It's available very soon, but the pricing is nutty. $9k usd....



          On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:47 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:

            Wait, 3.65 Medusa is available now?  I thought it was some 
undetermined date in the future.  Or did I misunderstand you?



            From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Dave
            Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 8:09 AM
            To: [email protected]


            Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DC+ Fiber



            We have a few towers with TOWER TOP control and management.
            The ones I designed are 24v and 48v. 
            We have only CMM4 boxes with the Planet switches which I use LC the 
hybrid cable comes from Besttronics.
            We have a #12 stranded pair in each of these. I have to have 
transtector Part#1101-626 at top and bottom to meet our
            surge protection compliance. 
            Since those sites have been installed I have had zero issues.

            Seems that 3.65Medusa has made us change to a more direct 
connection so my box design will have to be modified.
            All of the Orange tag cables will have to be removed since the 
packet flux will not support the new power requirements

            Here is one design we have plans to deploy next week.

            <image003.jpg>

            On 09/22/2018 05:05 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

              Are most people using SC or LC at the top of the tower? I want to 
use LC most everywhere I can, but I understand the advantage in SC on a tower 
where it's easier to work with larger things.

              What's the next bigger enclosure? Could you put something like 
this on a swinging panel where I could run a trunk cable into it and then plug 
individual patch cables going to each radio? Maybe easier on you if you just 
make it work with something else on the market, like these panels from 
FiberStore where someone can just get whatever panel they want (LC\SC\whatever)?

              https://www.fs.com/products/68962.html

              The goal is to emulate one of these:
              
https://www.raycap.com/wp-content/uploads/DC6-48-60-0-8C-EV_320-1318.pdf
              
https://www.raycap.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/DC6-48-60-18-8C-EV_320-1315-1.pdf

              Power and fiber in one box, transition from trunk to the ground 
to the radios.

              I'm sure they'd sell well.



              -----
              Mike Hammett
              Intelligent Computing Solutions

              Midwest Internet Exchange

              The Brothers WISP






------------------------------------------------------------------

              From: "Chuck McCown" mailto:[email protected]
              To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" mailto:[email protected]
              Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2018 4:51:48 PM
              Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DC+ Fiber

              Can put in a patch panel.  Just a mechanical thing to solve.

              But patch panels have cutouts for couplers.  And different 
couplers need different size holes in the part that holds them in.

              So if someone could tell me which coupler will always be needed, 
then this is easy.  



              Otherwise I have to offer a variety of coupler options and that 
multiplies my part numbers etc etc.

              Happy to do that but not if I only sell 1 per month.  



              From: Mike Hammett 

              Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2018 10:46 AM

              To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 

              Subject: [AFMUG] DC+ Fiber



              When do we see a 48v one of these? Also, more density?

              http://store.packetflux.com/sitemonitor-4-channel-relay-output/

              When do we see one of these with a fiber patch panel and slack 
storage?

              
https://www.mccowntech.com/product/8-circuit-outdoor-dc-power-line-surge-suppressor-protector-copy/



              -----
              Mike Hammett
              Intelligent Computing Solutions

              Midwest Internet Exchange

              The Brothers WISP






------------------------------------------------------------------

              -- 
              AF mailing list
              [email protected]
              http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


              -- 
              AF mailing list
              [email protected]
              http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com







            -- 



            -- 
            AF mailing list
            [email protected]
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com




          -- 
          AF mailing list
          [email protected]
          http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com








--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      -- 
      AF mailing list
      [email protected]
      http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

      -- 
      AF mailing list
      [email protected]
      http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


    -- 
    AF mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



  -- 
  AF mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to