Isn't the major gains that LTE is making right now largely due to more antennas/channels/power? And that is giving a higher time in the higher 256QAM? I didn't think there was any special sauce available to LTE that isn't available to other software programmable radios in some sort of proprietary protocol...???

On 09/24/2018 04:58 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
I’m not sure a 5 GHz LTE product makes sense, unless you’re talking carrier aggregation and LAA. Otherwise I question the “magic” of “LTE modulation”, once you try to use it in dirty spectrum. Oooooh, 256QAM. Like we haven’t been doing that for years. I put it in the same category as “3.65 GHz goes through trees”. Only if the noise floor is really low, and then it’s not the “S” part of SNR, it’s the “N” part that’s magic.

Maybe I’m missing something, but I’m not wanting to spend big bucks (and a big power budget) to use LTE in 5 GHz. Maybe if there’s some killer antenna technology, but I think that’s what Medusa does too. Not that it is any better on price or power consumption.

*From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Ray
*Sent:* Monday, September 24, 2018 6:44 PM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] DC+ Fiber

This would be better on the price front then if that is possible.

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Jon Langeler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Baicells just announced 5Ghz LTE, might be others.

    The brains of the Cambium 3G Medusa is apparently supposed to be
    capable of LTE modulation is what I thought I heard at the roadshow.
    It would be a future software option.

    Jon Langeler

    Michwave Technologies, Inc.


    On Sep 24, 2018, at 6:12 PM, <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    wrote:

        I really have not been paying any attention to this, but is
        there an unlicensed LTE radio?

        Meaning an unlicensed radio that uses LTE modulation methods.

        *From:*Adam Moffett

        *Sent:*Monday, September 24, 2018 4:09 PM

        *To:*[email protected]

        *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] DC+ Fiber

        What's nice LTE?  Baicells?
        A Telrad eNB might be "only" $7k, but you'll be north of $9k by
        the time you figure out all the licenses you need.

        I'd be curious about a 3.65 Medusa, but I wonder if I can set
        TDD parameters that will line up with our existing LTE frames.
        -Adam


        On 9/24/2018 3:45 PM, Ryan Ray wrote:

            It's gonna be on display in Vegas. I'm not even in USA so
            the CBRS stuff isn't really affecting us right now, but when
            you start looking at 9k per ap you could get some nice LTE
            instead.

            It's just surprising being 2k more than the 5ghz pmp450m.
            Especially with the cost of the SM being higher as well, but
            maybe the 450b 3.65 will solve that? Time will tell I guess.

            On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Ken Hohhof
            <[email protected]> wrote:

                That’s not surprising, if it includes the MU-MIMO
                activation key.  I guess nutty is in the eye of the
                beholder.

                But if it’s really available “soon”, I’m a little
                surprised, I was afraid they would wait to see what the
                FCC did with the PAL auction rules.  Also whether the
                industry decided that CBRS is only for LTE devices, even
                for fixed.

                And I thought Ubiquiti had trademarked the term SOON™.

                Anyway, I think something like LTE or cnMedusa is going
                to be necessary for CBRS, especially with the cost of
                paying a SAS vendor for each location and the cost of
                acquiring PAL licenses, and then only getting 10 MHz
                channels.  You don’t get much capacity from 10 MHz of
                spectrum unless you have all the fancy tricks like beam
                steering and bidirectional MU-MIMO, and of course at
                least 256QAM.

                *From:*AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Ray
                *Sent:* Monday, September 24, 2018 1:31 PM
                *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>

                *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] DC+ Fiber

                It's available very soon, but the pricing is nutty. $9k
                usd....

                On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:47 AM, Ken Hohhof
                <[email protected]> wrote:

                    Wait, 3.65 Medusa is available now?  I thought it
                    was some undetermined date in the future.  Or did I
                    misunderstand you?

                    *From:*AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Dave
                    *Sent:* Monday, September 24, 2018 8:09 AM
                    *To:* [email protected]


                    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] DC+ Fiber

                    We have a few towers with TOWER TOP control and
                    management.
                    The ones I designed are 24v and 48v.
                    We have only CMM4 boxes with the Planet switches
                    which I use LC the hybrid cable comes from Besttronics.
                    We have a #12 stranded pair in each of these. I have
                    to have transtector Part#1101-626 at top and bottom
                    to meet our
                    surge protection compliance.
                    Since those sites have been installed I have had
                    zero issues.

                    Seems that 3.65Medusa has made us change to a more
                    direct connection so my box design will have to be
                    modified.
                    All of the Orange tag cables will have to be removed
                    since the packet flux will not support the new power
                    requirements

                    Here is one design we have plans to deploy next week.

                    <image003.jpg>

                    On 09/22/2018 05:05 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

                        Are most people using SC or LC at the top of the
                        tower? I want to use LC most everywhere I can,
                        but I understand the advantage in SC on a tower
                        where it's easier to work with larger things.

                        What's the next bigger enclosure? Could you put
                        something like this on a swinging panel where I
                        could run a trunk cable into it and then plug
                        individual patch cables going to each radio?
                        Maybe easier on you if you just make it work
                        with something else on the market, like these
                        panels from FiberStore where someone can just
                        get whatever panel they want (LC\SC\whatever)?

                        https://www.fs.com/products/68962.html

                        The goal is to emulate one of these:
                        
https://www.raycap.com/wp-content/uploads/DC6-48-60-0-8C-EV_320-1318.pdf
                        
https://www.raycap.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/DC6-48-60-18-8C-EV_320-1315-1.pdf

                        Power and fiber in one box, transition from
                        trunk to the ground to the radios.

                        I'm sure they'd sell well.



                        -----
                        Mike Hammett
                        Intelligent Computing Solutions
                        <http://www.ics-il.com/>
                        Image removed by sender.
                        <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>Image removed by
                        sender.
                        
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>Image
                        removed by sender.
                        
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>Image
                        removed by sender. <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
                        Midwest Internet Exchange
                        <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
                        Image removed by sender.
                        <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>Image removed
                        by sender.
                        
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>Image
                        removed by sender. <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
                        The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
                        Image removed by sender.
                        <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>Image
                        removed by sender.


                        
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>

                        
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                        *From: *"Chuck McCown" mailto:[email protected]
                        *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
                        mailto:[email protected]
                        *Sent: *Saturday, September 22, 2018 4:51:48 PM
                        *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] DC+ Fiber

                        Can put in a patch panel.  Just a mechanical
                        thing to solve.

                        But patch panels have cutouts for couplers.  And
                        different couplers need different size holes in
                        the part that holds them in.

                        So if someone could tell me which coupler will
                        always be needed, then this is easy.

                        Otherwise I have to offer a variety of coupler
                        options and that multiplies my part numbers etc etc.

                        Happy to do that but not if I only sell 1 per
                        month.

                        *From:*Mike Hammett

                        *Sent:*Saturday, September 22, 2018 10:46 AM

                        *To:*AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group

                        *Subject:*[AFMUG] DC+ Fiber

                        When do we see a 48v one of these? Also, more
                        density?

                        
http://store.packetflux.com/sitemonitor-4-channel-relay-output/

                        When do we see one of these with a fiber patch
                        panel and slack storage?

                        
https://www.mccowntech.com/product/8-circuit-outdoor-dc-power-line-surge-suppressor-protector-copy/



                        -----
                        Mike Hammett
                        Intelligent Computing Solutions
                        <http://www.ics-il.com/>
                        Image removed by sender.
                        <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>Image removed by
                        sender.
                        
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>Image
                        removed by sender.
                        
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>Image
                        removed by sender. <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
                        Midwest Internet Exchange
                        <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
                        Image removed by sender.
                        <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>Image removed
                        by sender.
                        
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>Image
                        removed by sender. <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
                        The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
                        Image removed by sender.
                        <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>Image
                        removed by sender.


                        
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>

                        
------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- AF mailing list
                        [email protected]
                        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- AF mailing list
                        [email protected]
                        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

--

-- AF mailing list
                    [email protected]
                    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- AF mailing list
                [email protected]
                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- AF mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- AF mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com




--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to