I don't think there has been one made in maybe 5 years or more.

On Sun, Oct 28, 2018, 10:15 AM Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Any decent install vans with 4wd?
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:39 AM Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net>
> wrote:
>
>> This is a good discussion.  Tire size and ground clearance versus cost
>> per mile.  The best vans for off-road from Ford are the up to 2014
>> E-150/E-250.  We get 400,000 miles plus out of them and they can take a
>> beating.  The new Transits are 16” tires which is a disappointment and
>> there are few vendors.  We are planning on changing those wheels to 17”
>> shortly.    Didn’t catch that when we bought it.  Did find out the 2014
>> Chrysler Cargo Mini-Vans are 17” and bought one of those also at a great
>> price and they get good gas mileage.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of * Lewis Bergman
>> *Sent:* Friday, October 19, 2018 1:47 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Renewed discussion on work vans
>>
>>
>>
>> We have been happy with our Promaster series. We have one with the high
>> top long version which you do have to watch on windy days. Having said
>> that, we drive it regardless all around West Texas. We have the standard
>> height which is barely tall enough for a 6 foot guy to stand up in but it
>> works. It is the short wheel base version. Both work well, decent mileage.
>> Lots of room inside. We added some $25 Amazon LED's to bothwhich makes
>> findiing stuff bunches easier.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 3:35 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>
>> My techs seem embarrassed to be seen driving a van.  Real men drive
>> pickup trucks.  Diesel and dually = especially manly.  And expensive.
>>
>>
>>
>> If they HAVE to drive one of those sissy vans, then at least it should be
>> a medium roof height, tall enough to stand up in while searching for parts
>> and tools, but not so tall that you are afraid to drive it on a windy day.
>> But the best medium height option seems to be the Ford Transit, and they
>> also seem embarrassed to be seen driving a Ford.  Ram sounds manly, or
>> maybe Chevy.  Probably a tribal thing, are you a Ford, Chevy or Mopar guy?
>>
>>
>>
>> In my somewhat rural area, I don’t think the suspension or tires on
>> something like a Transit Connect are made for our roads and winter weather,
>> the ground clearance also seems inadequate.  Getting to some tower sites in
>> winter or after a heavy rain, I sometimes feel like my Forester is
>> marginal, a Transit Connect class van would be worse.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Paul McCall
>> *Sent:* Friday, October 19, 2018 3:14 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Renewed discussion on work vans
>>
>>
>>
>> Been quite a while since I saw this discussed…
>>
>>
>>
>> What is the preference for work vans these days?
>>
>>
>>
>> Transit
>>
>> Nissan
>>
>> Promasters
>>
>> Sprinter
>>
>>
>>
>> ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul , PDMNet
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to