Maybe this year Nissan does. I looked a couple years ago they didn't. On Sun, Oct 28, 2018, 12:28 PM Craig House <cr...@totalhighspeed.net> wrote:
> https://www.globalxvehicles.com/models.html > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 28, 2018, at 12:06, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't think there has been one made in maybe 5 years or more. > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018, 10:15 AM Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Any decent install vans with 4wd? >> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:39 AM Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> >> wrote: >> >>> This is a good discussion. Tire size and ground clearance versus cost >>> per mile. The best vans for off-road from Ford are the up to 2014 >>> E-150/E-250. We get 400,000 miles plus out of them and they can take a >>> beating. The new Transits are 16” tires which is a disappointment and >>> there are few vendors. We are planning on changing those wheels to 17” >>> shortly. Didn’t catch that when we bought it. Did find out the 2014 >>> Chrysler Cargo Mini-Vans are 17” and bought one of those also at a great >>> price and they get good gas mileage. >>> >>> >>> >>> Rory >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of * Lewis Bergman >>> *Sent:* Friday, October 19, 2018 1:47 PM >>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Renewed discussion on work vans >>> >>> >>> >>> We have been happy with our Promaster series. We have one with the high >>> top long version which you do have to watch on windy days. Having said >>> that, we drive it regardless all around West Texas. We have the standard >>> height which is barely tall enough for a 6 foot guy to stand up in but it >>> works. It is the short wheel base version. Both work well, decent mileage. >>> Lots of room inside. We added some $25 Amazon LED's to bothwhich makes >>> findiing stuff bunches easier. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 3:35 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >>> >>> My techs seem embarrassed to be seen driving a van. Real men drive >>> pickup trucks. Diesel and dually = especially manly. And expensive. >>> >>> >>> >>> If they HAVE to drive one of those sissy vans, then at least it should >>> be a medium roof height, tall enough to stand up in while searching for >>> parts and tools, but not so tall that you are afraid to drive it on a windy >>> day. But the best medium height option seems to be the Ford Transit, and >>> they also seem embarrassed to be seen driving a Ford. Ram sounds manly, or >>> maybe Chevy. Probably a tribal thing, are you a Ford, Chevy or Mopar guy? >>> >>> >>> >>> In my somewhat rural area, I don’t think the suspension or tires on >>> something like a Transit Connect are made for our roads and winter weather, >>> the ground clearance also seems inadequate. Getting to some tower sites in >>> winter or after a heavy rain, I sometimes feel like my Forester is >>> marginal, a Transit Connect class van would be worse. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Paul McCall >>> *Sent:* Friday, October 19, 2018 3:14 PM >>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> >>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Renewed discussion on work vans >>> >>> >>> >>> Been quite a while since I saw this discussed… >>> >>> >>> >>> What is the preference for work vans these days? >>> >>> >>> >>> Transit >>> >>> Nissan >>> >>> Promasters >>> >>> Sprinter >>> >>> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> Paul , PDMNet >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
