Its too funny how many times they have failed...much like his presidency. On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, 6:22 AM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:
> I just read the federal judge's order on the Michigan "Kraken" lawsuit. > > Among the various points she makes: > > * The evidence offered is sworn testimony of belief that something could > have happened. Belief is not evidence. > > * A US Court has no authority to provide the relief requested by the > plaintiff: A court can't order a state to change it's election results. > > * Under the 11th amendment of the US Constitution you can't sue a state > in a federal court. > > * Most of the same claims have already been brought to state courts and > already dismissed. > > * The point is moot because you say election tampering was immediately > apparent, but waited 3 weeks to file a suit --after results were already > certified. > > Any one of those reasons was enough to dismiss. Even to a non-lawyer it > seems like this never had a chance. Why did they bother? Was it more > about putting on the show? Was it, "the client wanted it so we did it"? > > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
