This strategy has never been about winning in court, rather, the idea is to
keep churning the water to provide cover to allies who can claim
"uncertainty surrounding the election results" and fodder for the faithful
who actually believe in some sort of grand fraudulent scheme.  It has gone
beyond moving the goalposts.  Not worth discussing it unless someone is
willing to make a single argument, in writing, alleging something that
would have a material effect on the results and then defend that point
exclusively till the point is conceded one way or another.

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 8:07 AM Steve Jones <[email protected]>
wrote:

> dont ever get a PET scan
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 7:33 AM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Its too funny how many times they have failed...much like his presidency.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, 6:22 AM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I just read the federal judge's order on the Michigan "Kraken" lawsuit.
>>>
>>> Among the various points she makes:
>>>
>>> * The evidence offered is sworn testimony of belief that something could
>>> have happened.  Belief is not evidence.
>>>
>>> * A US Court has no authority to provide the relief requested by the
>>> plaintiff: A court can't order a state to change it's election results.
>>>
>>> * Under the 11th amendment of the US Constitution you can't sue a state
>>> in a federal court.
>>>
>>> * Most of the same claims have already been brought to state courts and
>>> already dismissed.
>>>
>>> * The point is moot because you say election tampering was immediately
>>> apparent, but waited 3 weeks to file a suit --after results were already
>>> certified.
>>>
>>> Any one of those reasons was enough to dismiss.  Even to a non-lawyer it
>>> seems like this never had a chance.  Why did they bother?  Was it more
>>> about putting on the show?  Was it, "the client wanted it so we did it"?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>


--
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to