As far as I know, you can't really shut the auto adjust off on these things.

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 9:42 AM Steve Jones <[email protected]>
wrote:

> That sounds like aligning the free space optics without the auto adjust
> shut off
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021, 9:33 AM Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I've found that it works best to just align them visually using the
>> little plastic sight that comes with them. It doesn't really work very will
>> to use signal level to align the Mikrotik 60ghz stuff, because of the beam
>> forming... the arrows work fairly well, but it does seem to be almost
>> impossible to get it right on using those. The beam forming does seem to
>> work pretty well on them though, so they don't need to be terribly
>> precise... it's not at all like trying to align something like the
>> Ignitenets.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 9:20 AM Craig Baird <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm wondering if any of you have pointers for aligning these things. Do
>>> you just use the little arrow LEDs on the radio? I tried doing that but
>>> never could get them to all go out. When an arrow would light up, I'd move
>>> it that direction (very slowly), but I'd invariably overshoot, and the
>>> opposite arrow would come on, or in some cases, while adjusting
>>> horizontally, I'd suddenly get a vertical arrow lighting up that wasn't
>>> there before. I finally gave up and left it with a couple arrows on. It's
>>> running at full capacity, but if the signal isn't maxed out, I worry what
>>> will happen when there's a downpour. Any advice?
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 1:52 PM Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'll have to look at them again, but I think the mounts are basically
>>>> the same as the solid mounts for the old wireless wire dishes. I haven't
>>>> had any problems with the alignment adjuster screws seizing on any of
>>>> those, and I've used quite a few of them, but the u-bolts can certainly be
>>>> a problem... But that's easily fixed by just replacing the nuts with
>>>> something other than stainless. I've gotten into the habit of just
>>>> automatically replacing the nuts any time I see stainless hardware, or
>>>> greasing it, if I have to.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021, 7:34 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Did you use 320? Are they as bad as those at seizing?
>>>>> If it's like that I dont care how good the gear is I wont buy another.
>>>>> I dont like staff having to use angle grinders in field.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021, 3:45 PM Craig Baird <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Guessing when you say the new Mikrotik variant, you're talking about
>>>>>> the nRay. I just picked up a pair of those for a link of about 250 ft. 
>>>>>> One
>>>>>> issue I had with them is that the mount is all stainless steel hardware,
>>>>>> and about 10 minutes after slightly tightening everything up, I found all
>>>>>> the nuts were seized and I could no longer loosen it without breaking
>>>>>> bolts. Even the alignment adjuster screws have this issue. I noticed
>>>>>> everything was stainless before I started installing and should have just
>>>>>> waited until I could get some non-stainless nuts to replace the stainless
>>>>>> ones. But being the impatient idiot that I am, I decided I just wouldn't
>>>>>> tighten them down too much, and then I'd pick up new hardware the next 
>>>>>> time
>>>>>> I came back. Now, I'm looking at having to buy new mounts for both ends.
>>>>>> Why do manufacturers use all stainless hardware? When I owned my WISP, we
>>>>>> had this issue way back in the SmartBridge days (early 2000s). Seems like
>>>>>> manufacturers should know better.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:43 PM Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Mikrotiks are by far the easiest to align of any of the 60ghz
>>>>>>> stuff I've tried, and I think they're probably the most reliable too. I
>>>>>>> have a set of the new variant sitting here, and they look to be an
>>>>>>> improvement, but I haven't tried them yet. They would be my first choice
>>>>>>> for super short links.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I had high hopes for the Cambium 60ghz, but unfortunately it looks
>>>>>>> like they only support up to channel 4 (64.8ghz), which means they won't
>>>>>>> have significantly different range than the Mikrotiks, but if you need 
>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>> than 1 gig, they're likely the best thing out there at the moment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021, 6:07 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We ordered the newer variant of the wireless wire today, we will
>>>>>>>> see how it goes. We are waiting to see how the cambium product does and
>>>>>>>> plan on using the extensively for short short stuff, we have an odd 
>>>>>>>> number
>>>>>>>> of banks with remote drivethroughs very nearby.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm jaded on ignitnet. One of those incidental ones we dealt with
>>>>>>>> had killed one of our POPs off and on, the operator had the apparent
>>>>>>>> default 5ghz backup enabled and it was misaligned so it would 
>>>>>>>> sporadically
>>>>>>>> trash 5ghz, noisy useless bastards that they are
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021, 4:31 PM Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The 5ghz backup would have been pretty useless on longer links.
>>>>>>>>> The problem is that it has tiny antennas (8dbi, if I remember 
>>>>>>>>> right)... so
>>>>>>>>> it really only worked for really short links anyway, and even then, it
>>>>>>>>> seemed kind of buggy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 3:55 PM Sterling Jacobson <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It’s wise of them to have dropped 5GHz because it never really
>>>>>>>>>> worked all that well.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The radios/antennas didn’t seem to be made for it and it ends up
>>>>>>>>>> causing more issues than it solves IMO.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of * Carl
>>>>>>>>>> Peterson
>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 19, 2021 2:50 PM
>>>>>>>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Wireless Wire Dish @ 1km
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Seems strange to me that they dropped the 5GHz backup radio from
>>>>>>>>>> the GBE Plus and the AF60LR.  All the other 60GHz radios have a 5GHz 
>>>>>>>>>> backup
>>>>>>>>>> of some sort.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We have installed a number of the little 60GHz GBE radios and
>>>>>>>>>> they seem solid for short links with easy aim.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 3:31 PM Mathew Howard <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think they claim their "Wave AI" feature is supposed to somehow
>>>>>>>>>> magically make long links work better... but yeah, being able to use
>>>>>>>>>> 66-70ghz behaves more like 70/80ghz than the lower 60ghz band, so 
>>>>>>>>>> you can
>>>>>>>>>> do much longer distances... you still have the same problem with 
>>>>>>>>>> rain fade,
>>>>>>>>>> but even on something like a 1 mile link that will work at 64-65ghz, 
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> works a lot better, since you have more signal to work with.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 3:11 PM Carl Peterson <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is that the only extra magic in the LR?  They claim 12KM vs 2KM.
>>>>>>>>>> I would never try 12 but I'm tempted to go for up to 3.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 3:02 PM Mathew Howard <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> At 1km it won't drop much, but it will still drop occasionally.
>>>>>>>>>> Ubiquiti AF60LR will do a bit better than the other options, because 
>>>>>>>>>> it can
>>>>>>>>>> use the higher channels.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021, 2:16 PM Dev <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 700 meter Ignitenet MetroLinq PTP60-35 running around -48dbm
>>>>>>>>>> during clear day says it will do >2.5Gbps with this RSSI, these 
>>>>>>>>>> things do a
>>>>>>>>>> ton of bandwidth. It hangs in there surprisingly well during rain 
>>>>>>>>>> unless
>>>>>>>>>> it’s really DUMPING rain. I think during normal or heavy rain it’s 
>>>>>>>>>> still in
>>>>>>>>>> the mid to high 50’s. Doesn’t seem to use the 5GHz backup much, but 
>>>>>>>>>> traffic
>>>>>>>>>> drops off fast when you do. I have another link doing 1.3km, much 
>>>>>>>>>> worse in
>>>>>>>>>> heavy rain, but very impressive throughput when it’s not raining,
>>>>>>>>>> surprisingly.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > On Feb 19, 2021, at 11:51 AM, Steve Jones <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > We havent dealt with 60ghz other than as an outside contractor
>>>>>>>>>> so ive never looked at performance directly. At 1 km what kind of 
>>>>>>>>>> fade are
>>>>>>>>>> we talking in a normal rain shower, and in a downpour?
>>>>>>>>>> > We have had pretty good luck with af24 over the years but need
>>>>>>>>>> more capacity, the fade in 60ghz concerns me, and I never understood 
>>>>>>>>>> the 60
>>>>>>>>>> ghz ones with 5ghz backup. its like a cruise ship having a backup 
>>>>>>>>>> canoe
>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>> > AF mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> > [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Carl Peterson
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *PORT NETWORKS*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Baltimore, MD 21202
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> (410) 637-3707
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Carl Peterson
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *PORT NETWORKS*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Baltimore, MD 21202
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> (410) 637-3707
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to