It doesn't need to be fully autonomous, it can have a human in the loop authorizing use of force. Also, it doesn't really need to use lethal force as long as it is designed to not get instantly disabled by a couple 5.56x45mm hits. It could have five arms with tazer probes in them to grab the perp by both arms and both legs plus nutsack. You could spread bots out all over the city (including a couple at each school), and you only need a handful of officers at the station to control them. They would also be a good alternative to the no knock raids that have gotten out of control.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 11:31 PM Jan-GAMs <[email protected]> wrote: > On the face of it, it violates the three robot laws. Programming an > end-run around those 3 laws and us humans are in trouble. So how do we > program a robot to tell the difference between crazy carrying a gun and not > crazy? Killer vs. non-killer? Cop arresting criminal vs cop doing his > job? Cop carrying weapons? Can you bend over enough to kiss your ass > goodbye? > > I like those really fast dog-like robots the military is working on, they > could take out a whole platoon, silently. > On 6/7/22 08:23, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote: > > Is it just me, or does anyone else think that lethal robots are a really > bad idea? > > Jeff Broadwick > CTIconnect > 312-205-2519 Office > 574-220-7826 Cell > [email protected] > > On Jun 7, 2022, at 11:08 AM, Darin Steffl <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Maybe Tesla's new Optimus robot can help in future active shooter > situations. Send it in instead of scared humans and let it disable the bad > guy. > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022, 9:40 AM Andy Trimmell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I liked when the conversation started with people adding in some ways to >> possibly resolve things. Ideas are great. Pointing fingers is divisive. >> >> >> >> *From:* AF [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jan-GAMs >> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 07, 2022 10:28 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - here I go again... >> >> >> >> After republicans take office the police, firefighters, libraries and >> schools get defunded/reduced, I'm on a local fireboard, experinced it >> happen several times. Don't complain to me about who's doing the defunding. >> >> On 6/6/22 11:05, Steve Jones wrote: >> >> There has to be a decision made on what we want from police. >> >> You cant demand they shoot white shooters, but gently caress any other >> ethnicity. >> >> You cant demand police be demilitarized at the same time you demand they >> be ready to engage a heavily armed operator at a split second notice >> >> you cant demand police protect schools at all times while >> simultaneously eliminating 50 percent of the school resource officers. >> >> You cant demand the school resource officers be a soft presence while you >> also want them shooting perps in the face. >> >> You cant do any of this at all while also defunding the police. >> >> >> >> Military is ready because theyre always ready, police are never ready >> because theyre always in sensitivty classes, or being arrested for doing >> their job because the media said so. >> >> >> >> Firefightrs are no more capable of handling these situations than police, >> theyre all people >> >> >> >> Theres also insurability. Scene safety if paramount in all Emergency >> services. Firefighters dont run into active petrochemical fires the same as >> they would run into a residential structure fire. There is a line in which >> the insurance companies (and taxpayers) will not tolerate the risk. When >> monday morning quarterbacking gives way to tuesday morning reality, the >> demands will seem much less realistic >> >> >> >> >> >> I say we just burn it all. pick any longitudinal point and light her up. >> May only the strongest and fastest survive >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 12:51 PM castarritt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We've neutered the police so effectively they can't do the job anymore. >> We need terminator robots. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 12:49 PM Chuck McCown via AF <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I have been shot at, but never been in combat. I don’t carry a weapon >> because I don’t want that option. That option is one of the initial >> starting conditions of a higher order ordinary differential equation. >> >> I prefer a linear equation. >> >> >> >> If a firefighter is armored such that they can probably survive a >> gunshot, that would steer their thinking toward rescue over taking out the >> shooter. Let the cops do that. >> >> >> >> *From:* Jason McKemie >> >> *Sent:* Monday, June 6, 2022 11:09 AM >> >> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - here I go again... >> >> >> >> True, if they're properly trained and doing their job it would be more >> effective. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 12:05 PM Robert <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> There was also the shooting down in the south, where they had a school >> "police" officer who stood back and did nothing. That's not necessarily a >> solution either. >> >> On 6/6/22 9:58 AM, Jason McKemie wrote: >> >> Seems like we should just be giving additional funding to police >> departments so that they can have a regular presence at schools. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 11:08 AM Chuck McCown via AF <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I may regret posting this but I had a thought. >> >> >> >> How about we let the fire department handle active shooters at schools. >> >> They know how to get there fast. They are ready to go at an instants >> notice. >> >> They know how to breach any building and rescue survivors. >> >> They have heavy protective gear on, just add a layer of kevlar. >> >> Or give them extra/different gear they can don on the way to the >> incident. >> >> They sure as hell don’t stand around outside discussing jurisdiction and >> strategy. >> >> They care more about rescue than they do about their own lives. >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
