Everyone uses Chrome nowadays.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote:

> Example:  Powercode mostly loads and then seems to hang for quite awhile
> on Firefox, but loads fast on Chrome.
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I've never used EPMP but I have noticed some interfaces lag on one
>> browser and not on another.  What browser is everyone using when they see
>> lag?  What browser are those of you who aren't seeing lag using?
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>   Good job of merging 2 threads!  You win one free Internet!
>>>
>>>  *From:* Chuck McCown <[email protected]>
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:48 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant>
>>>
>>>   Yeah but you bought the advantage GUI license, right?
>>>
>>>  *From:* Sean Heskett <[email protected]>
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:45 AM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant>
>>>
>>>  less than 5 seconds on my iPhone as well.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Josh Luthman <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I doubt that 4 of my high end machines all have the same problem.  The
>>>> interface takes too long when it first shows up.  Maybe it's because it
>>>> gets all the information at once, maybe not.  Don't care.  I want it to be
>>>> more smooth and faster.
>>>>
>>>> My phone (Droid Maxx) is one of the most recent models for Android.
>>>> The interface is terribly slow and clumsy on that.
>>>>
>>>> Well if you feel a poor technology choice was the cause, that's fine,
>>>> but it's just flat out wrong.  I don't want to carry a big fat i7 laptop up
>>>> the tower when I could just simply use my phone.  It works with Ubiquiti,
>>>> FSK Cambium, Tranzeo, Trango, Mikrotik, etc it should only make sense the
>>>> one product with a clumsy interface needs fixed instead of changing my
>>>> devices that work with the competitors products (as well as different
>>>> products under their portfolio).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> i'm just stating that on all of our computers i've never seen the ePMP
>>>>> page load slowly.
>>>>>
>>>>> maybe it's a computer problem and not a device problem, just trying to
>>>>> bring valid input to the discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Josh Luthman <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why are you/others arguing that the speed is just fine?  This doesn't
>>>>>> even make sense.  There are people with slower laptops that work with 
>>>>>> other
>>>>>> modern devices and epmp is the only interface that loads slow.  There's 
>>>>>> no
>>>>>> point in arguing peoples valid complaints.  Are you trying to direct the
>>>>>> engineers attention to something else?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Three, maybe four seconds to load the initial screen and then two
>>>>>>> maybe three seconds to login. As I doubt a screen capture will work when
>>>>>>> I'm RDPed in, I'll record the entire login process when I get home and 
>>>>>>> post
>>>>>>> it up on YouTube.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>  *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>>>>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:26:09 PM
>>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   Login takes forever.  The first like 10-15 seconds just load and
>>>>>>> load and load.  Once you're in, it's acceptable in terms of page 
>>>>>>> rendering.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> we use macbook pro's and the ePMP GUI has never been slow for us.
>>>>>>>> It was UGLY, but they fixed that with version 2.0 haha.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> not sure why everyone says it's slow tho because we've never seen
>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2 cents
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -sean
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Nate Burke <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ok, Cambium, this is a little sad.  My Field Laptop, a Lenovo
>>>>>>>>> S10-3t, Atom Processor with Windows 8.1 cannot load the EPMP WEB 
>>>>>>>>> Pages in a
>>>>>>>>> timely manner.  We're talking 40-60 seconds for initial load, and 
>>>>>>>>> 20-30
>>>>>>>>> seconds per screen refresh/menu change.  Since I'm going to have to 
>>>>>>>>> go to
>>>>>>>>> the boss, and tell him that I need a new laptop to do any field
>>>>>>>>> troubleshooting for these new radios, what are the minimum system 
>>>>>>>>> specs for
>>>>>>>>> a machine to view the EPMP Screens?  Unless Cambium is going to get 
>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>> Web interface under control as of Yesterday.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They still swear that the GUI was all developed in house and not
>>>>>>>>> purchased (something I still can't believe).  I'd like to know who the
>>>>>>>>> engineers/managers are who signed off on that design.  I can only 
>>>>>>>>> imaging
>>>>>>>>> that there was a group of guys sitting around the conference table,
>>>>>>>>> watching the presentation on the GUI on the projector up front, all 
>>>>>>>>> nodding
>>>>>>>>> their heads in agreement, "I think this is a wonderful layout, the 
>>>>>>>>> field
>>>>>>>>> tech's won't mind waiting a couple extra minutes for the pages to 
>>>>>>>>> load so
>>>>>>>>> they can look this pretty!!"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think that Cambium should step up and get engineers from ALL
>>>>>>>>> aspects of product development out into the field.  40 seconds 
>>>>>>>>> waiting for
>>>>>>>>> the page to load is fine when you're sitting in the office, but not 
>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>> you have the laptop balanced on a stack of firewood in the freezing 
>>>>>>>>> rain
>>>>>>>>> trying to get to the monitoring page to see why a radio isn't linking 
>>>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>>> I think that every WISP on this list would be more than happy to host 
>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>> engineer for a day. Heck, even if they go into the parking lot and 
>>>>>>>>> assemble
>>>>>>>>> it on the tailgate of someone's Pickup, they'll get some idea of what 
>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>> experience.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have a feeling that if all steps of the Dev process took a week
>>>>>>>>> in the field, We'd have a radio that had a GUI that responded 
>>>>>>>>> instantly on
>>>>>>>>> any device, and radios that assembled and mounted (and unmounted) 
>>>>>>>>> with 1
>>>>>>>>> gloved hand.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> </rant>
>>>>>>>>> Nate
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to