Mike doesn't have Apple stuff primarily/at all.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:54 PM, James Howard <[email protected]> wrote:

> It seems the point that’s trying to be made is that your poor technology
> choices are that you don’t have only Apple devices…..
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:44 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant>
>
>
>
> I doubt that 4 of my high end machines all have the same problem.  The
> interface takes too long when it first shows up.  Maybe it's because it
> gets all the information at once, maybe not.  Don't care.  I want it to be
> more smooth and faster.
>
>
>
> My phone (Droid Maxx) is one of the most recent models for Android.  The
> interface is terribly slow and clumsy on that.
>
>
>
> Well if you feel a poor technology choice was the cause, that's fine, but
> it's just flat out wrong.  I don't want to carry a big fat i7 laptop up the
> tower when I could just simply use my phone.  It works with Ubiquiti, FSK
> Cambium, Tranzeo, Trango, Mikrotik, etc it should only make sense the one
> product with a clumsy interface needs fixed instead of changing my devices
> that work with the competitors products (as well as different products
> under their portfolio).
>
>
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> i'm just stating that on all of our computers i've never seen the ePMP
> page load slowly.
>
>
>
> maybe it's a computer problem and not a device problem, just trying to
> bring valid input to the discussion.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Josh Luthman <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Why are you/others arguing that the speed is just fine?  This doesn't even
> make sense.  There are people with slower laptops that work with other
> modern devices and epmp is the only interface that loads slow.  There's no
> point in arguing peoples valid complaints.  Are you trying to direct the
> engineers attention to something else?
>
>
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Three, maybe four seconds to load the initial screen and then two maybe
> three seconds to login. As I doubt a screen capture will work when I'm
> RDPed in, I'll record the entire login process when I get home and post it
> up on YouTube.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
> *To: *[email protected]
> *Sent: *Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:26:09 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant>
>
> Login takes forever.  The first like 10-15 seconds just load and load and
> load.  Once you're in, it's acceptable in terms of page rendering.
>
>
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> we use macbook pro's and the ePMP GUI has never been slow for us.  It was
> UGLY, but they fixed that with version 2.0 haha.
>
>
>
> not sure why everyone says it's slow tho because we've never seen it.
>
>
>
> 2 cents
>
>
>
> -sean
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ok, Cambium, this is a little sad.  My Field Laptop, a Lenovo S10-3t, Atom
> Processor with Windows 8.1 cannot load the EPMP WEB Pages in a timely
> manner.  We're talking 40-60 seconds for initial load, and 20-30 seconds
> per screen refresh/menu change.  Since I'm going to have to go to the boss,
> and tell him that I need a new laptop to do any field troubleshooting for
> these new radios, what are the minimum system specs for a machine to view
> the EPMP Screens?  Unless Cambium is going to get their Web interface under
> control as of Yesterday.
>
> They still swear that the GUI was all developed in house and not purchased
> (something I still can't believe).  I'd like to know who the
> engineers/managers are who signed off on that design.  I can only imaging
> that there was a group of guys sitting around the conference table,
> watching the presentation on the GUI on the projector up front, all nodding
> their heads in agreement, "I think this is a wonderful layout, the field
> tech's won't mind waiting a couple extra minutes for the pages to load so
> they can look this pretty!!"
>
> I think that Cambium should step up and get engineers from ALL aspects of
> product development out into the field.  40 seconds waiting for the page to
> load is fine when you're sitting in the office, but not when you have the
> laptop balanced on a stack of firewood in the freezing rain trying to get
> to the monitoring page to see why a radio isn't linking up.  I think that
> every WISP on this list would be more than happy to host an engineer for a
> day. Heck, even if they go into the parking lot and assemble it on the
> tailgate of someone's Pickup, they'll get some idea of what we experience.
>
> I have a feeling that if all steps of the Dev process took a week in the
> field, We'd have a radio that had a GUI that responded instantly on any
> device, and radios that assembled and mounted (and unmounted) with 1 gloved
> hand.
>
> </rant>
> Nate
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Total Control Panel*
>
> Login <https://asp.reflexion.net/login?domain=litewire.net>
>
> To: [email protected]
> <https://asp.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=242260993&domain=litewire.net>
>
> From:
> 0000014b08a883e2-7aabbe58-dc97-47e2-b8ae-71c6340abd63-000...@amazonses.com
> <https://asp.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=2994751605&domain=litewire.net>
>
> Remove
> <https://asp.reflexion.net/FooterAction?ver=2&un-wl-sender-domain=1&rID=242260993&aID=2994751605&domain=litewire.net>
> amazonses.com from my allow list
>
> *You received this message because the domain amazonses.com
> <http://amazonses.com> is on your allow list.*
>
>
>

Reply via email to