Did you include the second cert file? Mine works (also Godaddy). Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jan 20, 2015 4:56 PM, "Jeremy" <[email protected]> wrote:
> GoDaddy > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> What's your Powercode address? Who does your SSL cert? >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Jan 20, 2015 4:45 PM, "Jeremy" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I used to use Chrome. A few versions back they made it so that you >>> cannot save passwords for SSL exceptions, and cannot add permanent >>> exceptions. We use SSL on all of our APs, and according to chrome our >>> Billing server cert is incorrect, even though we have triple checked the >>> install and no other browsers flag it as insecure. This leaves us tapping >>> away super long and complicated passwords (what else would we use??) out in >>> the field in Chrome, or we use Firefox and deal with a bit of lag in >>> Powercode. I find that the small amount of lag is far better than >>> constantly trying to tap out passwords on a tablet. Ok, not trying to >>> derail this too far OT. Have those of you who are experiencing the lag >>> with EPMP tried another browser? >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Josh Luthman < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> User base is CLEARLY an important key!!! >>>> >>>> collected from W3Schools' log-files since 2002 >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp >>>>> >>>>> Chrome (no version attached) has 61% market share >>>>> >>>>> On January 20, 2015 10:31:25 AM AKST, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> But wait until Windows 10 comes out with the Spartan browser. >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:13 PM >>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2&qpcustomd=0 >>>>>> >>>>>> According to that everyone still uses Internet Explorer. I promise >>>>>> I'm as shocked as you are. >>>>>> >>>>>> Everyone uses Chrome nowadays. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Example: Powercode mostly loads and then seems to hang for quite >>>>>>> awhile on Firefox, but loads fast on Chrome. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've never used EPMP but I have noticed some interfaces lag on one >>>>>>>> browser and not on another. What browser is everyone using when they >>>>>>>> see >>>>>>>> lag? What browser are those of you who aren't seeing lag using? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Good job of merging 2 threads! You win one free Internet! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *From:* Chuck McCown <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:48 PM >>>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yeah but you bought the advantage GUI license, right? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *From:* Sean Heskett <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:45 AM >>>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> less than 5 seconds on my iPhone as well. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I doubt that 4 of my high end machines all have the same >>>>>>>>>> problem. The interface takes too long when it first shows up. >>>>>>>>>> Maybe it's >>>>>>>>>> because it gets all the information at once, maybe not. Don't care. >>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>> want it to be more smooth and faster. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My phone (Droid Maxx) is one of the most recent models for >>>>>>>>>> Android. The interface is terribly slow and clumsy on that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Well if you feel a poor technology choice was the cause, that's >>>>>>>>>> fine, but it's just flat out wrong. I don't want to carry a big fat >>>>>>>>>> i7 >>>>>>>>>> laptop up the tower when I could just simply use my phone. It works >>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>> Ubiquiti, FSK Cambium, Tranzeo, Trango, Mikrotik, etc it should only >>>>>>>>>> make >>>>>>>>>> sense the one product with a clumsy interface needs fixed instead of >>>>>>>>>> changing my devices that work with the competitors products (as well >>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>> different products under their portfolio). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> i'm just stating that on all of our computers i've never seen >>>>>>>>>>> the ePMP page load slowly. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> maybe it's a computer problem and not a device problem, just >>>>>>>>>>> trying to bring valid input to the discussion. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why are you/others arguing that the speed is just fine? This >>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't even make sense. There are people with slower laptops >>>>>>>>>>>> that work >>>>>>>>>>>> with other modern devices and epmp is the only interface that >>>>>>>>>>>> loads slow. >>>>>>>>>>>> There's no point in arguing peoples valid complaints. Are you >>>>>>>>>>>> trying to >>>>>>>>>>>> direct the engineers attention to something else? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Three, maybe four seconds to load the initial screen and >>>>>>>>>>>>> then two maybe three seconds to login. As I doubt a screen >>>>>>>>>>>>> capture will >>>>>>>>>>>>> work when I'm RDPed in, I'll record the entire login process when >>>>>>>>>>>>> I get >>>>>>>>>>>>> home and post it up on YouTube. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>>>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:26:09 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Login takes forever. The first like 10-15 seconds just >>>>>>>>>>>>> load and load and load. Once you're in, it's acceptable in terms >>>>>>>>>>>>> of page >>>>>>>>>>>>> rendering. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we use macbook pro's and the ePMP GUI has never been slow for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> us. It was UGLY, but they fixed that with version 2.0 haha. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not sure why everyone says it's slow tho because we've never >>>>>>>>>>>>>> seen it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 cents >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -sean >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Nate Burke < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, Cambium, this is a little sad. My Field Laptop, a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lenovo S10-3t, Atom Processor with Windows 8.1 cannot load the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPMP WEB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pages in a timely manner. We're talking 40-60 seconds for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> initial load, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and 20-30 seconds per screen refresh/menu change. Since I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to go to the boss, and tell him that I need a new laptop to do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any field >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> troubleshooting for these new radios, what are the minimum >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system specs for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a machine to view the EPMP Screens? Unless Cambium is going to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Web interface under control as of Yesterday. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They still swear that the GUI was all developed in house and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not purchased (something I still can't believe). I'd like to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know who the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineers/managers are who signed off on that design. I can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only imaging >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that there was a group of guys sitting around the conference >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> table, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching the presentation on the GUI on the projector up front, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all nodding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their heads in agreement, "I think this is a wonderful layout, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the field >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tech's won't mind waiting a couple extra minutes for the pages >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to load so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they can look this pretty!!" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that Cambium should step up and get engineers from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALL aspects of product development out into the field. 40 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seconds waiting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the page to load is fine when you're sitting in the office, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when you have the laptop balanced on a stack of firewood in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freezing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rain trying to get to the monitoring page to see why a radio >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't linking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up. I think that every WISP on this list would be more than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happy to host >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an engineer for a day. Heck, even if they go into the parking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assemble it on the tailgate of someone's Pickup, they'll get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some idea of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we experience. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a feeling that if all steps of the Dev process took a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week in the field, We'd have a radio that had a GUI that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responded >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instantly on any device, and radios that assembled and mounted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unmounted) with 1 gloved hand. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </rant> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >
