I did, but I think that may be where the problem lies.  I think that the
instructions that I was following had me put it in the wrong place.  That
is the next thing I was going to check.  I just don't have much time for
extra projects and for now Firefox works.  I need to figure out how to
generate my own SSL certs for all of our infrastructure gear so that I can
store them on the machine.

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:

> Did you include the second cert file?  Mine works (also Godaddy).
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Jan 20, 2015 4:56 PM, "Jeremy" <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> GoDaddy
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Josh Luthman <
>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> What's your Powercode address?  Who does your SSL cert?
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> On Jan 20, 2015 4:45 PM, "Jeremy" <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I used to use Chrome.  A few versions back they made it so that you
>>>> cannot save passwords for SSL exceptions, and cannot add permanent
>>>> exceptions.  We use SSL on all of our APs, and according to chrome our
>>>> Billing server cert is incorrect, even though we have triple checked the
>>>> install and no other browsers flag it as insecure.  This leaves us tapping
>>>> away super long and complicated passwords (what else would we use??) out in
>>>> the field in Chrome, or we use Firefox and deal with a bit of lag in
>>>> Powercode.  I find that the small amount of lag is far better than
>>>> constantly trying to tap out passwords on a tablet. Ok, not trying to
>>>> derail this too far OT.  Have those of you who are experiencing the lag
>>>> with EPMP tried another browser?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> User base is CLEARLY an important key!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> collected from W3Schools' log-files since 2002
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chrome (no version attached) has 61% market share
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On January 20, 2015 10:31:25 AM AKST, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  But wait until Windows 10 comes out with the Spartan browser.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  *From:* Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:13 PM
>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2&qpcustomd=0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> According to that everyone still uses Internet Explorer.  I promise
>>>>>>> I'm as shocked as you are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Everyone uses Chrome nowadays.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Example:  Powercode mostly loads and then seems to hang for quite
>>>>>>>> awhile on Firefox, but loads fast on Chrome.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've never used EPMP but I have noticed some interfaces lag on one
>>>>>>>>> browser and not on another.  What browser is everyone using when they 
>>>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>>>> lag?  What browser are those of you who aren't seeing lag using?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   Good job of merging 2 threads!  You win one free Internet!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  *From:* Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com>
>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:48 PM
>>>>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   Yeah but you bought the advantage GUI license, right?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  *From:* Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us>
>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:45 AM
>>>>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  less than 5 seconds on my iPhone as well.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Josh Luthman <
>>>>>>>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I doubt that 4 of my high end machines all have the same
>>>>>>>>>>> problem.  The interface takes too long when it first shows up.  
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe it's
>>>>>>>>>>> because it gets all the information at once, maybe not.  Don't 
>>>>>>>>>>> care.  I
>>>>>>>>>>> want it to be more smooth and faster.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> My phone (Droid Maxx) is one of the most recent models for
>>>>>>>>>>> Android.  The interface is terribly slow and clumsy on that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well if you feel a poor technology choice was the cause, that's
>>>>>>>>>>> fine, but it's just flat out wrong.  I don't want to carry a big 
>>>>>>>>>>> fat i7
>>>>>>>>>>> laptop up the tower when I could just simply use my phone.  It 
>>>>>>>>>>> works with
>>>>>>>>>>> Ubiquiti, FSK Cambium, Tranzeo, Trango, Mikrotik, etc it should 
>>>>>>>>>>> only make
>>>>>>>>>>> sense the one product with a clumsy interface needs fixed instead of
>>>>>>>>>>> changing my devices that work with the competitors products (as 
>>>>>>>>>>> well as
>>>>>>>>>>> different products under their portfolio).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> i'm just stating that on all of our computers i've never seen
>>>>>>>>>>>> the ePMP page load slowly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe it's a computer problem and not a device problem, just
>>>>>>>>>>>> trying to bring valid input to the discussion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Josh Luthman <
>>>>>>>>>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why are you/others arguing that the speed is just fine?  This
>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't even make sense.  There are people with slower laptops 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that work
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with other modern devices and epmp is the only interface that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> loads slow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's no point in arguing peoples valid complaints.  Are you 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct the engineers attention to something else?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Mike Hammett <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Three, maybe four seconds to load the initial screen and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then two maybe three seconds to login. As I doubt a screen 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capture will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work when I'm RDPed in, I'll record the entire login process 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when I get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> home and post it up on YouTube.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  *From: *"Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:26:09 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Login takes forever.  The first like 10-15 seconds just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> load and load and load.  Once you're in, it's acceptable in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rendering.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Sean Heskett <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we use macbook pro's and the ePMP GUI has never been slow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for us.  It was UGLY, but they fixed that with version 2.0 haha.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not sure why everyone says it's slow tho because we've never
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seen it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 cents
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -sean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Nate Burke <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> n...@blastcomm.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, Cambium, this is a little sad.  My Field Laptop, a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lenovo S10-3t, Atom Processor with Windows 8.1 cannot load the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPMP WEB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pages in a timely manner.  We're talking 40-60 seconds for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> initial load,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and 20-30 seconds per screen refresh/menu change.  Since I'm 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to go to the boss, and tell him that I need a new laptop to do 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any field
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> troubleshooting for these new radios, what are the minimum 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system specs for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a machine to view the EPMP Screens?  Unless Cambium is going 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Web interface under control as of Yesterday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They still swear that the GUI was all developed in house
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and not purchased (something I still can't believe).  I'd like 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to know who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the engineers/managers are who signed off on that design.  I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> imaging that there was a group of guys sitting around the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conference table,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching the presentation on the GUI on the projector up 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> front, all nodding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their heads in agreement, "I think this is a wonderful layout, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the field
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tech's won't mind waiting a couple extra minutes for the pages 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to load so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they can look this pretty!!"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that Cambium should step up and get engineers from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALL aspects of product development out into the field.  40 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seconds waiting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the page to load is fine when you're sitting in the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> office, but not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when you have the laptop balanced on a stack of firewood in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the freezing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rain trying to get to the monitoring page to see why a radio 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't linking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up.  I think that every WISP on this list would be more than 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happy to host
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an engineer for a day. Heck, even if they go into the parking 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assemble it on the tailgate of someone's Pickup, they'll get 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some idea of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we experience.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a feeling that if all steps of the Dev process took
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a week in the field, We'd have a radio that had a GUI that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instantly on any device, and radios that assembled and mounted 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unmounted) with 1 gloved hand.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </rant>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>

Reply via email to