http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp

Chrome (no version attached) has 61% market share

On January 20, 2015 10:31:25 AM AKST, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>But wait until Windows 10 comes out with the Spartan browser.
>
>From: Adam Moffett 
>Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:13 PM
>To: [email protected] 
>Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant>
>
>
>http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2&qpcustomd=0
>
>According to that everyone still uses Internet Explorer.  I promise I'm
>as shocked as you are.
>
>
>  Everyone uses Chrome nowadays.
>
>
>  Josh Luthman
>  Office: 937-552-2340
>  Direct: 937-552-2343
>  1100 Wayne St
>  Suite 1337
>  Troy, OH 45373
>
>On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Example:  Powercode mostly loads and then seems to hang for quite
>awhile on Firefox, but loads fast on Chrome.
>
>On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>I've never used EPMP but I have noticed some interfaces lag on one
>browser and not on another.  What browser is everyone using when they
>see lag?  What browser are those of you who aren't seeing lag using?
>
>  On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>        Good job of merging 2 threads!  You win one free Internet!
>
>        From: Chuck McCown 
>        Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:48 PM
>        To: [email protected] 
>        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant>
>
>        Yeah but you bought the advantage GUI license, right?
>
>        From: Sean Heskett 
>        Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:45 AM
>        To: [email protected] 
>        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant>
>
>        less than 5 seconds on my iPhone as well. 
>
>
>
>On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Josh Luthman
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>I doubt that 4 of my high end machines all have the same problem.  The
>interface takes too long when it first shows up.  Maybe it's because it
>gets all the information at once, maybe not.  Don't care.  I want it to
>be more smooth and faster. 
>
>My phone (Droid Maxx) is one of the most recent models for Android. 
>The interface is terribly slow and clumsy on that.
>
>Well if you feel a poor technology choice was the cause, that's fine,
>but it's just flat out wrong.  I don't want to carry a big fat i7
>laptop up the tower when I could just simply use my phone.  It works
>with Ubiquiti, FSK Cambium, Tranzeo, Trango, Mikrotik, etc it should
>only make sense the one product with a clumsy interface needs fixed
>instead of changing my devices that work with the competitors products
>(as well as different products under their portfolio).
>
>
>
>          Josh Luthman
>          Office: 937-552-2340
>          Direct: 937-552-2343
>          1100 Wayne St
>          Suite 1337
>          Troy, OH 45373
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>i'm just stating that on all of our computers i've never seen the ePMP
>page load slowly. 
>
>maybe it's a computer problem and not a device problem, just trying to
>bring valid input to the discussion.  
>
>On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Josh Luthman
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Why are you/others arguing that the speed is just fine?  This doesn't
>even make sense.  There are people with slower laptops that work with
>other modern devices and epmp is the only interface that loads slow. 
>There's no point in arguing peoples valid complaints.  Are you trying
>to direct the engineers attention to something else?
>
>
>
>              Josh Luthman
>              Office: 937-552-2340
>              Direct: 937-552-2343
>              1100 Wayne St
>              Suite 1337
>              Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Three, maybe four seconds to load the initial screen and then two maybe
>three seconds to login. As I doubt a screen capture will work when I'm
>RDPed in, I'll record the entire login process when I get home and post
>it up on YouTube.
>
>
>
>
>                -----
>                Mike Hammett
>                Intelligent Computing Solutions
>                http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
>                To: [email protected]
>                Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:26:09 PM
>                Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant>
>
>
>Login takes forever.  The first like 10-15 seconds just load and load
>and load.  Once you're in, it's acceptable in terms of page rendering.
>
>
>                Josh Luthman
>                Office: 937-552-2340
>                Direct: 937-552-2343
>                1100 Wayne St
>                Suite 1337
>                Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>we use macbook pro's and the ePMP GUI has never been slow for us.  It
>was UGLY, but they fixed that with version 2.0 haha. 
>
>  not sure why everyone says it's slow tho because we've never seen it.
>
>                  2 cents
>
>                  -sean
>
>
>
>On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Ok, Cambium, this is a little sad.  My Field Laptop, a Lenovo S10-3t,
>Atom Processor with Windows 8.1 cannot load the EPMP WEB Pages in a
>timely manner.  We're talking 40-60 seconds for initial load, and 20-30
>seconds per screen refresh/menu change.  Since I'm going to have to go
>to the boss, and tell him that I need a new laptop to do any field
>troubleshooting for these new radios, what are the minimum system specs
>for a machine to view the EPMP Screens?  Unless Cambium is going to get
>their Web interface under control as of Yesterday.
>
>They still swear that the GUI was all developed in house and not
>purchased (something I still can't believe).  I'd like to know who the
>engineers/managers are who signed off on that design.  I can only
>imaging that there was a group of guys sitting around the conference
>table, watching the presentation on the GUI on the projector up front,
>all nodding their heads in agreement, "I think this is a wonderful
>layout, the field tech's won't mind waiting a couple extra minutes for
>the pages to load so they can look this pretty!!"
>
>I think that Cambium should step up and get engineers from ALL aspects
>of product development out into the field.  40 seconds waiting for the
>page to load is fine when you're sitting in the office, but not when
>you have the laptop balanced on a stack of firewood in the freezing
>rain trying to get to the monitoring page to see why a radio isn't
>linking up.  I think that every WISP on this list would be more than
>happy to host an engineer for a day. Heck, even if they go into the
>parking lot and assemble it on the tailgate of someone's Pickup,
>they'll get some idea of what we experience.
>
>I have a feeling that if all steps of the Dev process took a week in
>the field, We'd have a radio that had a GUI that responded instantly on
>any device, and radios that assembled and mounted (and unmounted) with
>1 gloved hand.
>
>                    </rant>
>                    Nate

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Reply via email to