User base is CLEARLY an important key!!! collected from W3Schools' log-files since 2002
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp > > Chrome (no version attached) has 61% market share > > On January 20, 2015 10:31:25 AM AKST, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> But wait until Windows 10 comes out with the Spartan browser. >> >> *From:* Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:13 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> >> >> >> >> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2&qpcustomd=0 >> >> According to that everyone still uses Internet Explorer. I promise I'm >> as shocked as you are. >> >> Everyone uses Chrome nowadays. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Example: Powercode mostly loads and then seems to hang for quite awhile >>> on Firefox, but loads fast on Chrome. >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I've never used EPMP but I have noticed some interfaces lag on one >>>> browser and not on another. What browser is everyone using when they see >>>> lag? What browser are those of you who aren't seeing lag using? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Good job of merging 2 threads! You win one free Internet! >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Chuck McCown <[email protected]> >>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:48 PM >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> >>>>> >>>>> Yeah but you bought the advantage GUI license, right? >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Sean Heskett <[email protected]> >>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:45 AM >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> >>>>> >>>>> less than 5 seconds on my iPhone as well. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Josh Luthman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I doubt that 4 of my high end machines all have the same problem. >>>>>> The interface takes too long when it first shows up. Maybe it's because >>>>>> it >>>>>> gets all the information at once, maybe not. Don't care. I want it to >>>>>> be >>>>>> more smooth and faster. >>>>>> >>>>>> My phone (Droid Maxx) is one of the most recent models for Android. >>>>>> The interface is terribly slow and clumsy on that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Well if you feel a poor technology choice was the cause, that's fine, >>>>>> but it's just flat out wrong. I don't want to carry a big fat i7 laptop >>>>>> up >>>>>> the tower when I could just simply use my phone. It works with Ubiquiti, >>>>>> FSK Cambium, Tranzeo, Trango, Mikrotik, etc it should only make sense the >>>>>> one product with a clumsy interface needs fixed instead of changing my >>>>>> devices that work with the competitors products (as well as different >>>>>> products under their portfolio). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> i'm just stating that on all of our computers i've never seen the >>>>>>> ePMP page load slowly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> maybe it's a computer problem and not a device problem, just trying >>>>>>> to bring valid input to the discussion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why are you/others arguing that the speed is just fine? This >>>>>>>> doesn't even make sense. There are people with slower laptops that >>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>> with other modern devices and epmp is the only interface that loads >>>>>>>> slow. >>>>>>>> There's no point in arguing peoples valid complaints. Are you trying >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> direct the engineers attention to something else? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Three, maybe four seconds to load the initial screen and then >>>>>>>>> two maybe three seconds to login. As I doubt a screen capture will >>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>> when I'm RDPed in, I'll record the entire login process when I get >>>>>>>>> home and >>>>>>>>> post it up on YouTube. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>>>>>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:26:09 PM >>>>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Login takes forever. The first like 10-15 seconds just load >>>>>>>>> and load and load. Once you're in, it's acceptable in terms of page >>>>>>>>> rendering. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> we use macbook pro's and the ePMP GUI has never been slow for >>>>>>>>>> us. It was UGLY, but they fixed that with version 2.0 haha. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> not sure why everyone says it's slow tho because we've never seen >>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2 cents >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -sean >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Nate Burke <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ok, Cambium, this is a little sad. My Field Laptop, a Lenovo >>>>>>>>>>> S10-3t, Atom Processor with Windows 8.1 cannot load the EPMP WEB >>>>>>>>>>> Pages in a >>>>>>>>>>> timely manner. We're talking 40-60 seconds for initial load, and >>>>>>>>>>> 20-30 >>>>>>>>>>> seconds per screen refresh/menu change. Since I'm going to have to >>>>>>>>>>> go to >>>>>>>>>>> the boss, and tell him that I need a new laptop to do any field >>>>>>>>>>> troubleshooting for these new radios, what are the minimum system >>>>>>>>>>> specs for >>>>>>>>>>> a machine to view the EPMP Screens? Unless Cambium is going to get >>>>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>>> Web interface under control as of Yesterday. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> They still swear that the GUI was all developed in house and not >>>>>>>>>>> purchased (something I still can't believe). I'd like to know who >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> engineers/managers are who signed off on that design. I can only >>>>>>>>>>> imaging >>>>>>>>>>> that there was a group of guys sitting around the conference table, >>>>>>>>>>> watching the presentation on the GUI on the projector up front, all >>>>>>>>>>> nodding >>>>>>>>>>> their heads in agreement, "I think this is a wonderful layout, the >>>>>>>>>>> field >>>>>>>>>>> tech's won't mind waiting a couple extra minutes for the pages to >>>>>>>>>>> load so >>>>>>>>>>> they can look this pretty!!" >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think that Cambium should step up and get engineers from ALL >>>>>>>>>>> aspects of product development out into the field. 40 seconds >>>>>>>>>>> waiting for >>>>>>>>>>> the page to load is fine when you're sitting in the office, but not >>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>> you have the laptop balanced on a stack of firewood in the freezing >>>>>>>>>>> rain >>>>>>>>>>> trying to get to the monitoring page to see why a radio isn't >>>>>>>>>>> linking up. >>>>>>>>>>> I think that every WISP on this list would be more than happy to >>>>>>>>>>> host an >>>>>>>>>>> engineer for a day. Heck, even if they go into the parking lot and >>>>>>>>>>> assemble >>>>>>>>>>> it on the tailgate of someone's Pickup, they'll get some idea of >>>>>>>>>>> what we >>>>>>>>>>> experience. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have a feeling that if all steps of the Dev process took a >>>>>>>>>>> week in the field, We'd have a radio that had a GUI that responded >>>>>>>>>>> instantly on any device, and radios that assembled and mounted (and >>>>>>>>>>> unmounted) with 1 gloved hand. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> </rant> >>>>>>>>>>> Nate >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >
