I do not have any instock. Only the Tycon POE. BTW, the Tone alignment
worked perfectly on the link.
Erich Kaiser
North Central Tower Consulting
er...@northcentraltower.com
Office: 630-621-4804
Cell: 630-777-9291
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
> Have you tried the WB GigE-POE-APC?
>
> *From:* Erich Kaiser <er...@northcentraltower.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 12, 2015 8:01 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Site Monitor Gigabit POE Injector Issue, related
> to AirFiber 24
>
> I am going to try a tycon power DC POE tomorrow, see if that will work,
> just need to get it working at this point... Next step would be to run a
> new Cat5. Current Cat5 is Apex9.
>
> Erich Kaiser
> North Central Tower Consulting
> er...@northcentraltower.com
> Office: 630-621-4804
> Cell: 630-777-9291
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>
>> Another (totally hypothetical) thought would be perhaps one of the
>> pairs has a slight DC unbalance causing the DC current not to split
>> equally, thus causing some DC flux in one of the transformers and degrading
>> the pulse characteristics of the transformer. Which could happen if the
>> UBNT injector has transformers with higher saturation specs than the
>> Packetflux injector.
>>
>> *From:* George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) <geo...@cbcast.com>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 12, 2015 7:09 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Site Monitor Gigabit POE Injector Issue, related
>> to AirFiber 24
>>
>> Is it an AF24 or 5? The 24 uses 50 watts. The power control relays on
>> the regular and GigE injectors will only handle 1A @ 48VDC. If it's a 24,
>> you're likely over that. The relay contacts are probably fused.
>>
>> The AF specific single-port injector uses a solid-state relay like a
>> SyncInjector and can handle 2A, or more, I forget what Forrest said.
>>
>> That said, if the radio isn't getting enough power, it will be
>> unpredictable. I have seen this happen. Sounds like you've tried the
>> PacketFlux single AF injector and that does it too? Works fine with the
>> UBNT brick? I have no idea.
>>
>> On 2/12/2015 6:52 PM, Erich Kaiser wrote:
>>
>> Guys this is not my first rodeo, This is the new Gigabit 8 Port Injector
>> and I have also tried the Packetflux Airfiber Injector, same issue, switch
>> to stock UBNT POE and it works fine. This is an all DC site, with separate
>> DC to DC converters and everything is fused.....
>>
>> See POE directions direct from Packetflux
>>
>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>
>> Erich Kaiser
>> North Central Tower Consulting
>> er...@northcentraltower.com
>> Office: 630-621-4804
>> Cell: 630-777-9291
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It should not work with a regular POE injector. 50 watts is too much
>>> current for 4 pins; you need to supply power on all 8 pins. And that, in
>>> turn, requires transformers to isolate the data lines.
>>>
>>> So I would not expect it to work at all with a vanilla POE. Well, maybe
>>> it might work for a little while, and it would probably only do 100baseT.
>>> Then the 4/5 & 7/8 pins will fry.
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/12/2015 4:20 PM, Erich Kaiser wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyone else seen any issues with the Airfiber Module or running the
>>> Airfiber through the Gigabit POE Injector. I am seeing an issue with TX
>>> data, RX works fine, getting full bandwidth. TX I get about 2Mbps. Hooked
>>> up to Regular POE and everything is fine, any ideas?
>>>
>>>
>>> Erich Kaiser
>>> North Central Tower Consulting
>>> er...@northcentraltower.com
>>> Office: 630-621-4804
>>> Cell: 630-777-9291
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
