We're using both the Tycon, and the Packetflux. Have also used the stock UBNT injectors.

Oh wait. Did your know that some of the early Packetflux injectors were mislabeled? But that reversed polarity.... Would expect that to let the smoke out.

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 2/12/2015 6:01 PM, Erich Kaiser wrote:
I am going to try a tycon power DC POE tomorrow, see if that will work, just need to get it working at this point... Next step would be to run a new Cat5. Current Cat5 is Apex9.

Erich Kaiser
North Central Tower Consulting
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Office: 630-621-4804
Cell: 630-777-9291

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Another (totally hypothetical) thought would be perhaps one of the
    pairs has a slight DC unbalance causing the DC current not to
    split equally, thus causing some DC flux in one of the
    transformers and degrading the pulse characteristics of the
    transformer.  Which could happen if the UBNT injector has
    transformers with higher saturation specs than the Packetflux
    injector.
    *From:* George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Sent:* Thursday, February 12, 2015 7:09 PM
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Site Monitor Gigabit POE Injector Issue,
    related to AirFiber 24
    Is it an AF24 or 5? The 24 uses 50 watts. The power control relays
    on the regular and GigE injectors will only handle 1A @ 48VDC. If
    it's a 24, you're likely over that. The relay contacts are
    probably fused.

    The AF specific single-port injector uses a solid-state relay like
    a SyncInjector and can handle 2A, or more, I forget what Forrest said.

    That said, if the radio isn't getting enough power, it will be
    unpredictable. I have seen this happen. Sounds like you've tried
    the PacketFlux single AF injector and that does it too? Works fine
    with the UBNT brick? I have no idea.

    On 2/12/2015 6:52 PM, Erich Kaiser wrote:
    Guys this is not my first rodeo, This is the new Gigabit 8 Port
    Injector and I have also tried the Packetflux Airfiber Injector,
    same issue, switch to stock UBNT POE and it works fine.  This is
    an all DC site, with separate DC to DC converters and everything
    is fused.....
    See POE directions direct from Packetflux
    Inline image 1
    Erich Kaiser
    North Central Tower Consulting
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    Office: 630-621-4804 <tel:630-621-4804>
    Cell: 630-777-9291 <tel:630-777-9291>
    On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        It should not work with a regular POE injector.  50 watts is
        too much current for 4 pins; you need to supply power on all
        8 pins.  And that, in turn, requires transformers to isolate
        the data lines.

So I would not expect it to work at all with a vanilla POE. Well, maybe it might work for a little while, and it would
        probably only do 100baseT.  Then the 4/5 & 7/8 pins will fry.

        bp
        <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

        On 2/12/2015 4:20 PM, Erich Kaiser wrote:
        Anyone else seen any issues with the Airfiber Module or
        running the Airfiber through the Gigabit POE Injector.  I am
        seeing an issue with TX data, RX works fine, getting full
        bandwidth.  TX I get about 2Mbps.  Hooked up to Regular POE
        and everything is fine, any ideas?
        Erich Kaiser
        North Central Tower Consulting
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        Office: 630-621-4804 <tel:630-621-4804>
        Cell: 630-777-9291 <tel:630-777-9291>




Reply via email to