I don't see a lot of point in bothering with the Titanium Rockets... the standard Rockets are XW hardware now, so you get the faster processor. if you want the better shielding just get those RF elements shields and it will still be cheaper than a Ti or if you're using RF armor, it's irrelevant anyway. If you need more than 100M ethernet, get a real backhaul.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote: > What’s funny is that I’ve got the original Titaniums still up over 2 > years with no problems and no downtime. They were still on 5.3 but I’ll be > upgrading them tomorrow. However, I don’t see any reason to pay the > difference between the Rocket 5M and the Titanium with 20MHz channels, > especially if you have RF Armor shields. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jerry Richardson > *Sent:* Monday, March 2, 2015 9:52 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Rocket series shields > > > > We have two up. I can say they are better than the Rockets they replaced > but can’t speak to failure rates. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Keefe John > *Sent:* Monday, March 02, 2015 8:48 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Rocket series shields > > > > We see a very high failure rate on Titanium radios...even the new XW > version. > > On 3/2/2015 10:37 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > The new ones with XW hardware are working great? How long have they been > in service? > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Jerry Richardson" <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Monday, March 2, 2015 10:35:23 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Rocket series shields > > Working great. No GPS of course but immediately saw throughput > improvements. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Mike Hammett > *Sent:* Monday, March 02, 2015 8:29 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Rocket series shields > > > > Are the Tis actually working for you? They have a troubled past and the > outlook on the new ones is still uncertain. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Jerry Richardson" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Monday, March 2, 2015 10:26:07 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Rocket series shields > > We are replacing Rockets with Titanium AP and antennas. We see instant > performance improvements particularly with links over 12 miles. > > > > Jerry > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Sunday, March 01, 2015 9:08 AM > *To:* Animal Farm > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Rocket series shields > > > > How many of you are using the RF armor shields or similar on your Rocket > radios? Do you have a before and after scenario in real world > applications? > > Thanks > > Jaime Solorza > > Wireless Systems Architect > > 915-861-1390 > > > > > > >
