RF armor shield you mean? Unless you've gotten a hold of those neat RF elements Rocket case.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 2, 2015 12:27 PM, "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't see a lot of point in bothering with the Titanium Rockets... the > standard Rockets are XW hardware now, so you get the faster processor. if > you want the better shielding just get those RF elements shields and it > will still be cheaper than a Ti or if you're using RF armor, it's > irrelevant anyway. If you need more than 100M ethernet, get a real backhaul. > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> > wrote: > >> What’s funny is that I’ve got the original Titaniums still up over 2 >> years with no problems and no downtime. They were still on 5.3 but I’ll be >> upgrading them tomorrow. However, I don’t see any reason to pay the >> difference between the Rocket 5M and the Titanium with 20MHz channels, >> especially if you have RF Armor shields. >> >> >> >> Rory >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jerry Richardson >> *Sent:* Monday, March 2, 2015 9:52 AM >> >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Rocket series shields >> >> >> >> We have two up. I can say they are better than the Rockets they replaced >> but can’t speak to failure rates. >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On >> Behalf Of *Keefe John >> *Sent:* Monday, March 02, 2015 8:48 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Rocket series shields >> >> >> >> We see a very high failure rate on Titanium radios...even the new XW >> version. >> >> On 3/2/2015 10:37 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: >> >> The new ones with XW hardware are working great? How long have they >> been in service? >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From: *"Jerry Richardson" <je...@richardson.bz> <je...@richardson.bz> >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Monday, March 2, 2015 10:35:23 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Rocket series shields >> >> Working great. No GPS of course but immediately saw throughput >> improvements. >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On >> Behalf Of *Mike Hammett >> *Sent:* Monday, March 02, 2015 8:29 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Rocket series shields >> >> >> >> Are the Tis actually working for you? They have a troubled past and the >> outlook on the new ones is still uncertain. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From: *"Jerry Richardson" <je...@richardson.bz> >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Monday, March 2, 2015 10:26:07 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Rocket series shields >> >> We are replacing Rockets with Titanium AP and antennas. We see instant >> performance improvements particularly with links over 12 miles. >> >> >> >> Jerry >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On >> Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza >> *Sent:* Sunday, March 01, 2015 9:08 AM >> *To:* Animal Farm >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Rocket series shields >> >> >> >> How many of you are using the RF armor shields or similar on your Rocket >> radios? Do you have a before and after scenario in real world >> applications? >> >> Thanks >> >> Jaime Solorza >> >> Wireless Systems Architect >> >> 915-861-1390 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
