For Rockets there are two different shields. One is the "Rock Shield" which shields the original Rocket case. Second there is the shield that bolts onto some of the parabolic dishes that provides slightly better sidelobe performance on the dishes themselves.

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 3/2/2015 9:38 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I think he means exactly what he said being that he later addressed RF Armor directly.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
*To: *[email protected]
*Sent: *Monday, March 2, 2015 11:36:54 AM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Rocket series shields

RF armor shield you mean? Unless you've gotten a hold of those neat RF elements Rocket case.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mar 2, 2015 12:27 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I don't see a lot of point in bothering with the Titanium
    Rockets... the standard Rockets are XW hardware now, so you get
    the faster processor. if you want the better shielding just get
    those RF elements shields and it will still be cheaper than a Ti
    or if you're using RF armor, it's irrelevant anyway. If you need
    more than 100M ethernet, get a real backhaul.

    On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Rory Conaway
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        What’s funny is that I’ve got the original Titaniums still up
        over 2 years with no problems and no downtime.  They were
        still on 5.3 but I’ll be upgrading them tomorrow.  However, I
        don’t see any reason to pay the difference between the Rocket
        5M and the Titanium with 20MHz channels, especially if you
        have RF Armor shields.

        Rory

        *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Jerry Richardson
        *Sent:* Monday, March 2, 2015 9:52 AM


        *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Rocket series shields

        We have two up. I can say they are better than the Rockets
        they replaced but can’t speak to failure rates.

        *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Keefe John
        *Sent:* Monday, March 02, 2015 8:48 AM
        *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Rocket series shields

        We see a very high failure rate on Titanium radios...even the
        new XW version.

        On 3/2/2015 10:37 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

            The new ones with XW hardware are working great? How long
            have they been in service?



            -----
            Mike Hammett
            Intelligent Computing Solutions
            http://www.ics-il.com

            
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>

            
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            *From: *"Jerry Richardson" <[email protected]>
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Sent: *Monday, March 2, 2015 10:35:23 AM
            *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Rocket series shields

            Working great. No GPS of course but immediately saw
            throughput improvements.

            *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
            *Mike Hammett
            *Sent:* Monday, March 02, 2015 8:29 AM
            *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Rocket series shields

            Are the Tis actually working for you? They have a troubled
            past and the outlook on the new ones is still uncertain.



            -----
            Mike Hammett
            Intelligent Computing Solutions
            http://www.ics-il.com

            
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>

            
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            *From: *"Jerry Richardson" <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>>
            *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Sent: *Monday, March 2, 2015 10:26:07 AM
            *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Rocket series shields

            We are replacing Rockets with Titanium AP and antennas. We
            see instant performance improvements particularly with
            links over 12 miles.

            Jerry

            *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
            *Jaime Solorza
            *Sent:* Sunday, March 01, 2015 9:08 AM
            *To:* Animal Farm
            *Subject:* [AFMUG] Rocket series shields

            How many of you are using the RF armor shields or similar
            on your Rocket radios?   Do you have a before and after
            scenario in real world applications?

            Thanks

            Jaime Solorza

            Wireless Systems Architect

            915-861-1390 <tel:915-861-1390>




Reply via email to