Not this one. This one is running a pair of PMP450s in 5 GHz.
We're putting up a pair of PMP450s soon on different POPs; one will go
into a syncinjector, the other will be a CTM.
Is there some issue that you're seeing on the 3GHz varaiety?
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 3/2/2015 10:06 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Doesn't matter. The RJ45's are just pass-thru. The new universal pipes
pull power from two pins, so it can be used with either PMP100/450 or
430 APs. But I always have the guys put the jumper out to the radio
into the center RJ45 and the cable from the injector to the RJ45 with
the LEDs, just as standard practice, not that it matters.
I do have a question for you about this though.. is this SyncInjector
running 3GHz 450 APs?
On 3/2/2015 11:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
Thanks George!
i take it from the description that this boogers up the power/outputs
such that (ether?) RJ45 on the parasitic can be used to connect to
the syncinjector? One of the RJ45s has lights, and the other is just
a vanilla shielded RJ45 (I'm looking at a rev H1). So I can just
build this little jumper for between the 6p6c and the adjacent RJ45,
then use the outer RJ45 to connect to the syncinjector?
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 3/2/2015 9:44 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Yes.
http://manuals.packetflux.com/index.php?page=using-a-syncpipe-parasitic-with-a-syncinjector
On 3/2/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
We have a syncpipe basic that we think is starting to act up. It
seems to lose sync about once every day or two for about 1 second.
It's starting to raise havoc with long-lasting client sessions
through the affected APs.
We only have a couple of syncpipe parasitics in stock; can one of
these be swapped in place of a basic to run a sync injector?