Hey Forrest, any luck on the updated build for the Base-1's, minus the web GUI of course? I would really like to get the .0 row via SNMPwalk so my indexed Cacti template works for both Base-1's and 2's.

On 3/4/2015 3:57 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:

There are some pulse counts on the syncinjectors which may help you troubleshoot. Pulses used should go up by one every second, no more, no less. None of the other counters should increment except very rarely.

If you're seeing anything else, shoot a couple of screenshots into cust...@packetflux.com <mailto:cust...@packetflux.com>

On Mar 2, 2015 1:50 PM, "George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)" <geo...@cbcast.com <mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>> wrote:

    Yes, there are issues I'm seeing with AutoSync on all bands with
    13.2/13.2.1. <http://13.2.1.> But 3GHz is... different, and I
    don't know why. I have a couple APs on a SyncInjector and some
    single APs on parasitic pipes. I thought it was just the
    SyncInjector or something else at the site until I started seeing
    the same problems on the parasitics after just a few days of
    install at new sites. They all have the on-board GPS disabled too.
    Random LBT hits, the APs show inSync and outSync counts but no
    lost/acquired timing messages in the event log, and the
    SyncInjector says nothing happened, SMs going crazy losing
    session, APs reporting SMs out of range when things go nuts and I
    have to reboot the AP(s). AutoSync+FreeRun get stuck in FreeRun.
    Something in the FPGA code or some other logic screwed up. I have
    no idea, so I hope Cambium can figure it out.

    On 3/2/2015 12:25 PM, Bill Prince wrote:

        Not this one.  This one is running a pair of PMP450s in 5 GHz.

        We're putting up a pair of PMP450s soon on different POPs; one
        will go into a syncinjector, the other will be a CTM.

        Is there some issue that you're seeing on the 3GHz varaiety?


        bp
        <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

        On 3/2/2015 10:06 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:

            Doesn't matter. The RJ45's are just pass-thru. The new
            universal pipes pull power from two pins, so it can be
            used with either PMP100/450 or 430 APs. But I always have
            the guys put the jumper out to the radio into the center
            RJ45 and the cable from the injector to the RJ45 with the
            LEDs, just as standard practice, not that it matters.

            I do have a question for you about this though.. is this
            SyncInjector running 3GHz 450 APs?

            On 3/2/2015 11:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote:

                Thanks George!

                i take it from the description that this boogers up
                the power/outputs such that (ether?) RJ45 on the
parasitic can be used to connect to the syncinjector? One of the RJ45s has lights, and the other is just a
                vanilla shielded RJ45 (I'm looking at a rev H1).  So I
                can just build this little jumper for between the 6p6c
                and the adjacent RJ45, then use the outer RJ45 to
                connect to the syncinjector?

                bp
                <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

                On 3/2/2015 9:44 AM, George Skorup (Cyber
                Broadcasting) wrote:

                    Yes.
                    
http://manuals.packetflux.com/index.php?page=using-a-syncpipe-parasitic-with-a-syncinjector

                    On 3/2/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:


                        We have a syncpipe basic that we think is
                        starting to act up. It seems to lose sync
                        about once every day or two for about 1
                        second. It's starting to raise havoc with
                        long-lasting client sessions through the
                        affected APs.

                        We only have a couple of syncpipe parasitics
                        in stock; can one of these be swapped in place
                        of a basic to run a sync injector?










Reply via email to