Looks like the GPS is losing lock. The counters I'm talking about are on the analog tab On Mar 4, 2015 8:58 AM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I reset these counters about a week ago. I think this is not normal? > > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > On 3/4/2015 1:57 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: > > There are some pulse counts on the syncinjectors which may help you > troubleshoot. Pulses used should go up by one every second, no more, no > less. None of the other counters should increment except very rarely. > > If you're seeing anything else, shoot a couple of screenshots into > cust...@packetflux.com > On Mar 2, 2015 1:50 PM, "George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)" < > geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: > >> Yes, there are issues I'm seeing with AutoSync on all bands with 13.2/ >> 13.2.1. But 3GHz is... different, and I don't know why. I have a couple >> APs on a SyncInjector and some single APs on parasitic pipes. I thought it >> was just the SyncInjector or something else at the site until I started >> seeing the same problems on the parasitics after just a few days of install >> at new sites. They all have the on-board GPS disabled too. Random LBT hits, >> the APs show inSync and outSync counts but no lost/acquired timing messages >> in the event log, and the SyncInjector says nothing happened, SMs going >> crazy losing session, APs reporting SMs out of range when things go nuts >> and I have to reboot the AP(s). AutoSync+FreeRun get stuck in FreeRun. >> Something in the FPGA code or some other logic screwed up. I have no idea, >> so I hope Cambium can figure it out. >> >> On 3/2/2015 12:25 PM, Bill Prince wrote: >> >>> Not this one. This one is running a pair of PMP450s in 5 GHz. >>> >>> We're putting up a pair of PMP450s soon on different POPs; one will go >>> into a syncinjector, the other will be a CTM. >>> >>> Is there some issue that you're seeing on the 3GHz varaiety? >>> >>> >>> bp >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> >>> On 3/2/2015 10:06 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote: >>> >>>> Doesn't matter. The RJ45's are just pass-thru. The new universal pipes >>>> pull power from two pins, so it can be used with either PMP100/450 or 430 >>>> APs. But I always have the guys put the jumper out to the radio into the >>>> center RJ45 and the cable from the injector to the RJ45 with the LEDs, just >>>> as standard practice, not that it matters. >>>> >>>> I do have a question for you about this though.. is this SyncInjector >>>> running 3GHz 450 APs? >>>> >>>> On 3/2/2015 11:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks George! >>>>> >>>>> i take it from the description that this boogers up the power/outputs >>>>> such that (ether?) RJ45 on the parasitic can be used to connect to the >>>>> syncinjector? One of the RJ45s has lights, and the other is just a >>>>> vanilla >>>>> shielded RJ45 (I'm looking at a rev H1). So I can just build this little >>>>> jumper for between the 6p6c and the adjacent RJ45, then use the outer RJ45 >>>>> to connect to the syncinjector? >>>>> >>>>> bp >>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>> >>>>> On 3/2/2015 9:44 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yes. >>>>>> http://manuals.packetflux.com/index.php?page=using-a-syncpipe-parasitic-with-a-syncinjector >>>>>> >>>>>> On 3/2/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We have a syncpipe basic that we think is starting to act up. It >>>>>>> seems to lose sync about once every day or two for about 1 second. It's >>>>>>> starting to raise havoc with long-lasting client sessions through the >>>>>>> affected APs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We only have a couple of syncpipe parasitics in stock; can one of >>>>>>> these be swapped in place of a basic to run a sync injector? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >