Looks like the GPS is losing lock.

The counters I'm talking about are on the analog tab
On Mar 4, 2015 8:58 AM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:

>  I reset these counters about a week ago. I think this is not normal?
>
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 3/4/2015 1:57 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
>
> There are some pulse counts on the syncinjectors which may help you
> troubleshoot.  Pulses used should go up by one every second, no more, no
> less.  None of the other counters should increment except very rarely.
>
> If you're seeing anything else, shoot a couple of screenshots into
> cust...@packetflux.com
> On Mar 2, 2015 1:50 PM, "George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)" <
> geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, there are issues I'm seeing with AutoSync on all bands with 13.2/
>> 13.2.1. But 3GHz is... different, and I don't know why. I have a couple
>> APs on a SyncInjector and some single APs on parasitic pipes. I thought it
>> was just the SyncInjector or something else at the site until I started
>> seeing the same problems on the parasitics after just a few days of install
>> at new sites. They all have the on-board GPS disabled too. Random LBT hits,
>> the APs show inSync and outSync counts but no lost/acquired timing messages
>> in the event log, and the SyncInjector says nothing happened, SMs going
>> crazy losing session, APs reporting SMs out of range when things go nuts
>> and I have to reboot the AP(s). AutoSync+FreeRun get stuck in FreeRun.
>> Something in the FPGA code or some other logic screwed up. I have no idea,
>> so I hope Cambium can figure it out.
>>
>> On 3/2/2015 12:25 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
>>
>>> Not this one.  This one is running a pair of PMP450s in 5 GHz.
>>>
>>> We're putting up a pair of PMP450s soon on different POPs; one will go
>>> into a syncinjector, the other will be a CTM.
>>>
>>> Is there some issue that you're seeing on the 3GHz varaiety?
>>>
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>> On 3/2/2015 10:06 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Doesn't matter. The RJ45's are just pass-thru. The new universal pipes
>>>> pull power from two pins, so it can be used with either PMP100/450 or 430
>>>> APs. But I always have the guys put the jumper out to the radio into the
>>>> center RJ45 and the cable from the injector to the RJ45 with the LEDs, just
>>>> as standard practice, not that it matters.
>>>>
>>>> I do have a question for you about this though.. is this SyncInjector
>>>> running 3GHz 450 APs?
>>>>
>>>> On 3/2/2015 11:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks George!
>>>>>
>>>>> i take it from the description that this boogers up the power/outputs
>>>>> such that (ether?) RJ45 on the parasitic can be used to connect to the
>>>>> syncinjector?  One of the RJ45s has lights, and the other is just a 
>>>>> vanilla
>>>>> shielded RJ45 (I'm looking at a rev H1).  So I can just build this little
>>>>> jumper for between the 6p6c and the adjacent RJ45, then use the outer RJ45
>>>>> to connect to the syncinjector?
>>>>>
>>>>> bp
>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/2/2015 9:44 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>> http://manuals.packetflux.com/index.php?page=using-a-syncpipe-parasitic-with-a-syncinjector
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/2/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We have a syncpipe basic that we think is starting to act up. It
>>>>>>> seems to lose sync about once every day or two for about 1 second. It's
>>>>>>> starting to raise havoc with long-lasting client sessions through the
>>>>>>> affected APs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We only have a couple of syncpipe parasitics in stock; can one of
>>>>>>> these be swapped in place of a basic to run a sync injector?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to