Torch or Packet Sniffer? Torch is nice because you get kind of a rolling snapshot of the traffic for an IP or group of IPs or whatever. The Packet Sniffer actually allows you to collect pcap data (that I then load into wireshark).

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 3/9/2015 11:02 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:

FWIW, torch is painful. It's a seriously dumbed down version of tcpdump. I don't know why they don't just ditch torch and use the OSS and much better equivalent anyway.

On Mar 9, 2015 9:54 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:

    There are lots of SNMP based monitoring tools without integrating
    with “billing”.
    Also you gain a lot of interactive troubleshooting tools with a
    router at each tower that have nothing to do with billing or
    monitoring.  Think in terms of a Winbox session to a Mikrotik
    router, and tools like Torch.  Even if he goes with VLANs, an
    intelligent device at the tower is worth its cost many times over.
    *From:* Mathew Howard <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Sent:* Monday, March 09, 2015 12:48 PM
    *To:* af <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a bridged
    network torouted. (More Info)
    But it seems like his primary reason for going routed at this
    point is to get better monitoring abilities... and a good billing
    system would accomplish most of that.

    I would start replacing all the switches at the towers with
    something like Mikrotik RB2011's... you could just configure them
    all as switches to start out and get all the hardware you need in
    place before you actually change anything, if nothing else, you'd
    gain the Mikrotik's internal graphing to give you a better idea
    what's going on in the short term.
    On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Let the guy do his routed network.  A billing system is not a
        prerequisite. Although if he has something in mind like
        Powercode for the future, it might be good to take that into
        consideration since it has a network element (BMU) that has to
        go somewhere.
        *From:* Bill Prince <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Sent:* Monday, March 09, 2015 12:17 PM
        *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a
        bridged network torouted. (More Info)
        Free for 30 days, or free for up to 30 "sensors".  The way I
        use sensors on our network, that will cover about 2 devices.

            http://www.paessler.com/prtg/download

        bp
        <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

        On 3/9/2015 10:13 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

            PRTG is free and will monitor all your stuff if you fire
            up an internal subnet for it.
            *From:* Brandon Yuchasz <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Sent:* Monday, March 09, 2015 10:43 AM
            *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a
            bridged network torouted. (More Info)

            Alright so I have always said I am not proud too admit
            when I am uneducated in an area if it means learning
            something I need to know. So as embarrassing as it is Ill
            open to robe.

            All APs are Cambium FSK and we are now deploying the
            PMP450 as well. Backhauls are a mix of companies but we
            are looking to try and standardize, Cambium, and Ligowave
            are the most used.

            Ill just use one site because they are all evolved in a
            similar way. But we have several different sites that are
            all very similar.

            The site I would like to do first is Tower one, 5 FSK APs
            (PMP450 coming soon) This site has a shed no heat and my
            equipment at the base is secured in a locking large steel
            box. Think of a truck tool box. Backhauled to Tower 2
            through Ligowave and tower two has 5 FSK APs and one
            PMP450. This site is really remote no roads and its all
            tied together in a weatherproof box.

            So no managed switches, Single IP and DHCP. Never went
            then way of NAT.

            We have no real monitoring for customers date use, we
            limit up and down speeds at the SM. We don’t shape no caps
            you get the idea. So existing equipment is useless for
            this process. Our customers are quite happy with the
            services but I am blind. I will most likely double my size
            in the next 6 months and I can’t keep doing it this way.

            Brandon

            *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy
            *Sent:* Monday, March 09, 2015 10:51 AM
            *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a
            bridged networktorouted.

            Also, depending on your monitoring system, you should be
            able to track CPE and AP bandwidth as is.

            On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Ken Hohhof
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            The availability of inexpensive Mikrotik routers made this
            much less of an issue than it used to be.  Even at
            micropops that I bridge, I put a small Mikrotik like a
            450G or a 2011 there as a managed switch.  That way it can
            be converted to routed, often without a truck roll.

            One question is how you assign IP addresses to customers.
            Static with NAT in CPE? DHCP?  PPPoE? Do you NAT multiple
            customers to one public IP?  This may determine which
            approach is easiest to migrate to. Router at each tower
            with block of public IPs? VLANs to central site with big
            central router?

            *From:*That One Guy <mailto:[email protected]>

            *Sent:*Monday, March 09, 2015 10:23 AM

            *To:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

            *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a
            bridged networktorouted.

            not to hijack you, but there are some who maintain a fully
            bridged network and use VLAN instead of routing, this I am
            curious about, it may be a cost effective solution for you
            as well.

            I started our migration 4ish years ago and had the budget
            cut out from under me with only half the routers deployed,
            let me tell you, a 50/50 network sucks a great deal to
            manage. whatever you do, make sure you have all your
            routers on your desk before you begin

            On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Chuck McCown
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                Everyone seems to have lived through this evolution at
                some point.

                A bridged WISP is asking for trouble.

                How many APs and how many sites?  Are the switches at
                the sites capable of supporting VLANs?  That is where
                I would start. Either that or replacing the switches
                with routers. Personally, one router with VLANS to
                each AP via managed switches would be my preference.

                *From:*Brandon Yuchasz <mailto:[email protected]>

                *Sent:*Monday, March 09, 2015 9:10 AM

                *To:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

                *Subject:*[AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a
                bridged network torouted.

                I am looking for help converting our network from
                bridged to routed. This is something I don’t have a
                lot of background in but I also don’t want to end the
                process having a system I can’t fix so I will need
                someone that is willing to both do the work and teach
                me at the same time. Depending on how the process
                works in regards to time I am hoping to spend an hour
                a week working over the phone and through a remote
                desktop app.

                My main reasons for working on this now are I need to
                see bandwidth use per SM, per AP, and have better ways
                of tracking both long term. We are just to blind right
                now and starting to really grow again I need to get it
                under control now before we get to large.

                I am open to suggestions on routers but already had
                purchased microtik and butches scripts which after
                trying and failing to get it to work never implemented.

                Contact me off list [email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]> if you can help.

                Thanks,

                Brandon Yuchasz

                GogebicRange.net



--
            If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't
            see your team as part of yourself you have already failed
            as part of the team.



Reply via email to