Exactly.

From: Bill Prince 
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 1:15 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a bridged network 
torouted. (More Info)

Torch or Packet Sniffer?  Torch is nice because you get kind of a rolling 
snapshot of the traffic for an IP or group of IPs or whatever.  The Packet 
Sniffer actually allows you to collect pcap data (that I then load into 
wireshark).


bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 3/9/2015 11:02 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:

  FWIW, torch is painful. It's a seriously dumbed down version of tcpdump. I 
don't know why they don't just ditch torch and use the OSS and much better 
equivalent anyway.

  On Mar 9, 2015 9:54 AM, Ken Hohhof mailto:[email protected] wrote:

    There are lots of SNMP based monitoring tools without integrating with 
“billing”.

    Also you gain a lot of interactive troubleshooting tools with a router at 
each tower that have nothing to do with billing or monitoring.  Think in terms 
of a Winbox session to a Mikrotik router, and tools like Torch.  Even if he 
goes with VLANs, an intelligent device at the tower is worth its cost many 
times over.


    From: Mathew Howard 
    Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 12:48 PM
    To: af 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a bridged network 
torouted. (More Info)

    But it seems like his primary reason for going routed at this point is to 
get better monitoring abilities... and a good billing system would accomplish 
most of that.


    I would start replacing all the switches at the towers with something like 
Mikrotik RB2011's... you could just configure them all as switches to start out 
and get all the hardware you need in place before you actually change anything, 
if nothing else, you'd gain the Mikrotik's internal graphing to give you a 
better idea what's going on in the short term.


    On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:

      Let the guy do his routed network.  A billing system is not a 
prerequisite.  Although if he has something in mind like Powercode for the 
future, it might be good to take that into consideration since it has a network 
element (BMU) that has to go somewhere.

      From: Bill Prince 
      Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 12:17 PM
      To: [email protected] 
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a bridged network 
torouted. (More Info)

      Free for 30 days, or free for up to 30 "sensors".  The way I use sensors 
on our network, that will cover about 2 devices.

        http://www.paessler.com/prtg/download

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 3/9/2015 10:13 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

        PRTG is free and will monitor all your stuff if you fire up an internal 
subnet for it.  

        From: Brandon Yuchasz 
        Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 10:43 AM
        To: [email protected] 
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a bridged network 
torouted. (More Info)

        Alright so I have always said I am not proud too admit when I am 
uneducated in an area if it means learning something I need to know. So as 
embarrassing as it is Ill open to robe.



        All  APs are Cambium FSK and we are now deploying the PMP450 as well. 
Backhauls are a mix of companies but we are looking to try and standardize, 
Cambium, and Ligowave are the most used.



        Ill just use one site because they are all evolved in a similar way. 
But we have several different sites that are all very similar. 



        The site I would like to do first is Tower one, 5 FSK APs (PMP450 
coming soon) This site has a shed no heat and my equipment at the base is 
secured in a locking large steel box. Think of a truck tool box. Backhauled to 
Tower 2 through Ligowave and tower two has 5 FSK APs and one PMP450. This site 
is really remote no roads and its all tied together in a weatherproof box. 



        So no managed switches, Single IP and DHCP. Never went then way of NAT. 
           



        We have no real monitoring for customers date use, we limit up and down 
speeds at the SM. We don’t shape no caps you get the idea. So existing 
equipment is useless for this process. Our customers are quite happy with the 
services but I am blind. I will most likely double my size in the next 6 months 
and I can’t keep doing it this way.



        Brandon







        From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeremy
        Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 10:51 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a bridged 
networktorouted.



        Also, depending on your monitoring system, you should be able to track 
CPE and AP bandwidth as is. 



        On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:

        The availability of inexpensive Mikrotik routers made this much less of 
an issue than it used to be.  Even at micropops that I bridge, I put a small 
Mikrotik like a 450G or a 2011 there as a managed switch.  That way it can be 
converted to routed, often without a truck roll.



        One question is how you assign IP addresses to customers.  Static with 
NAT in CPE?  DHCP?  PPPoE?  Do you NAT multiple customers to one public IP?  
This may determine which approach is easiest to migrate to.  Router at each 
tower with block of public IPs?  VLANs to central site with big central router?





        From: That One Guy 

        Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 10:23 AM

        To: [email protected] 

        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a bridged 
networktorouted.



        not to hijack you, but there are some who maintain a fully bridged 
network and use VLAN instead of routing, this I am curious about, it may be a 
cost effective solution for you as well. 



        I started our migration 4ish years ago and had the budget cut out from 
under me with only half the routers deployed, let me tell you, a 50/50 network 
sucks a great deal to manage. whatever you do, make sure you have all your 
routers on your desk before you begin



        On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

          Everyone seems to have lived through this evolution at some point.

          A bridged WISP is asking for trouble.  



          How many APs and how many sites?  Are the switches at the sites 
capable of supporting VLANs?  That is where I would start.  Either that or 
replacing the switches with routers.  Personally, one router with VLANS to each 
AP via managed switches would be my preference.  



          From: Brandon Yuchasz 

          Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 9:10 AM

          To: [email protected] 

          Subject: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a bridged network 
torouted.



          I am looking for help converting our network from bridged to routed. 
This is something I don’t have a lot of background in but I also don’t want to 
end the process having a system I can’t fix so I will need someone that is 
willing to both do the work and teach me at the same time. Depending on how the 
process works in regards to time I am hoping to spend an hour a week working 
over the phone and through a remote desktop app. 



          My main reasons for working on this now are I need to see bandwidth 
use per SM, per AP, and have better ways of tracking both long term. We are 
just to blind right now and starting to really grow again I need to get it 
under control now before we get to large.



          I am open to suggestions on routers but already had purchased 
microtik and butches scripts which after trying and failing to get it to work 
never implemented. 



          Contact me off list [email protected] if you can help.



          Thanks,

          Brandon Yuchasz

          GogebicRange.net







        -- 

        If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your 
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.







Reply via email to