If you need the noise immunity, you probably need the sync as well. ;-) 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@spitwspots.com> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 1:41:32 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] quick Air Fiber 5X question 

Hrm. It's doing a bit over 10Mbps/1MHz (AF5). Rumored 1024QAM. GPS sync, less 
than 24W. Better noise immunity than even AirPrism (although it is 
exceptionally good) in initial testing. Connectorized... 

So it's only niche is GPS sync? Really? For $399? With as low latency? 

What am I missing here? 

--
Josh Reynolds
CIO, SPITwSPOTS www.spitwspots.com 
On 03/12/2015 10:15 PM, Paul McCall wrote: 




I agree with this assessment Jon. There are plenty of other products that can 
get you whatever BW you need (cheaper) with adaptive. If you are looking at 
AirFiber 5x, you are almost definitely doing that for the Sync of 2 or more 
links off a tower. That’s the niche of the product as far as I see it. We have 
5 links on order and are excited about hanging them 



From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Jon Langeler 
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 12:53 AM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] quick Air Fiber 5X question 


You can't 'stack' channels on top of each other with non-sync products (run the 
spectrum analysis). When you add sync, you can stack and overlap. If your going 
to venture into AirFiber, your already past the 'small potatoes' category IMO 
and you probably need to upgrade a good 2-3 links... 

Sent from my iPhone 


On Mar 12, 2015, at 11:36 PM, Kurt Fankhauser < li...@wavelinc.com > wrote: 
<blockquote>




I think it is more spectrally effiecient to run these radios in adaptive mode 
and use a smaller channel width than running them in 50/50 and running wider 
channels! Who the heck has backhauls running at symmetrical speeds anyway? 



Sync isn't for every application... 









Kurt Fankhauser 
Wavelinc Communications 
P.O. Box 126 
Bucyrus, OH 44820 
http://www.wavelinc.com 
tel. 419-562-6405 
fax. 419-617-0110 


On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: 


Using sync promotes a far higher spectral efficiency than you'll ever get out 
of a dynamic mode. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:26:42 PM 



Subject: Re: [AFMUG] quick Air Fiber 5X question 

3/4 want it, it looks like! 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: 


FWIW, I don't consider it important at all. Should not be condoning non-sync 
uses. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Chuck Macenski" < ch...@macenski.com > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 9:36:08 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] quick Air Fiber 5X question 




Well...we have a lot on our plate right now, but, life is long. I will say that 
we generally add features when we perceive a broad market demand, not to simply 
say "me too". As they say, if you are following, the view is always the same :) 




Chuck 



On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Kurt Fankhauser < li...@wavelinc.com > wrote: 


Cambium PTP650 can run in dynamic mode. And I was hoping this product would be 
a PTP650 killer. 

Sent from my iPhone 



Kurt Fankhauser 

Wavelinc Communications 

P.O. Box 126 

Bucyrus, OH 44820 

http://www.wavelinc.com 

tel. 419-562-6405 

fax. 419-617-0110 


On Mar 12, 2015, at 7:39 PM, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 
<blockquote>


Well if it's dynamic it can go the other way! Following the demand. 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 



On Mar 12, 2015 7:32 PM, "George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)" < 
geo...@cbcast.com > wrote: 

Josh, I think you're missing something. If you do rings and a link goes down, 
more traffic starts going the other direction, or reverses completely. So IMO, 
50/50 is fine because it's not full duplex and I don't want to have to flip a 
link from 75/25 to 25/75 (or whatever options there are). A link goes down, 
traffic changes and I do not want to take down yet another link to fix perhaps 
a temporary issue. OR cause a much larger permanent issue, e.g. config apply or 
reboot makes the radio(s) not come back up. 

And AFAIK, the AF5X isn't capable of FDD. It's not your regular airFiber with 
two radios, or separate Tx and Rx antennas, or whatever it is. 

On 3/12/2015 4:17 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: 
<blockquote>


We're ISPs. Our backhauls don't really need any upstream other than the 
upstream needed to sustain downstream. 



Could you first get an idea on what the benefit would be? If it would be <5% 
additional bandwidth it doesn't make much sense. Sync isn't a big deal to me 
unless I replace ALL backhauls with af5x which just isn't a realistic 
possibility. 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Chuck Macenski < ch...@macenski.com > wrote: 


Hi, 


There are no plans for airFiber dynamic framing at the moment. It could be done 
if you didn't care about having multiple units synced together (as the framing 
would be changing). I don't know how much more in one direction we could make 
this and meet DFS rules for those bands... Is there a need for this? 



Chuck 





On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 

Will there be? 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Chuck Macenski < ch...@macenski.com > wrote: 




<blockquote>



Hi, 


No. Currently we support 50/50, 75/25, and 67/33 (either master to slave or 
slave to master). 



Chuck 







On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Kurt Fankhauser < li...@wavelinc.com > wrote: 

I'm talking half duplex, sorry. 









Kurt Fankhauser 
Wavelinc Communications 
P.O. Box 126 
Bucyrus, OH 44820 
http://www.wavelinc.com 
tel. 419-562-6405 
fax. 419-617-0110 




On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Bill Prince < part15...@gmail.com > wrote: 

If you're running them full dux, you don't need no steenking adaptive duty 
cycle... bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> 



On 3/12/2015 12:53 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: 
<blockquote>


Does the airfiber 5X (or any other variation of AF) support adaptive duty 
cycle? Or am I locked down to 50/50 or 75/25 etc???? 







Kurt Fankhauser 
Wavelinc Communications 
P.O. Box 126 
Bucyrus, OH 44820 
http://www.wavelinc.com 
tel. 419-562-6405 
fax. 419-617-0110 





</blockquote>




</blockquote>


</blockquote>






</blockquote>

</blockquote>


Reply via email to