Generally, many chips actually work no problem and should be able to run 256 
QAM down into 2.4 Ghz, but the dependency is having RFICs out there that 
support it, clients that are expecting it in the beacons since it’s not in the 
standard, and clearly 80 MHz modes are not an option.

Obviously off the shelf true Wi-Fi clients (smartphones, tablets, etc.) likely 
aren’t going to be compatible or negotiate those rates since it’s not in the 
standard that they’re expecting those rates as advertised in that band.

So it won’t be true Wi-Fi since there’s no interoperability or requirements to 
support the actual 11ac standard in 2.4 GHz, but there’s nothing stopping it 
from working in a fixed vendor implementation so long as both AP and client can 
support it and the RF is there to do it on both sides.

Cheers,

Jaime Fink • Mimosa<http://www.mimosa.co/> • CPO & Co-Founder

This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of 
the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by 
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or 
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply 
email and delete all copies of this message.


From: Bill Prince
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
Date: Friday, March 13, 2015 at 1:31 PM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AC spec available in 2.4?

if there's no chip set, no one will be making any.

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>



On 3/13/2015 1:23 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:
It would really be nice if Ubiquiti would come out with 2.4 AC, I use their 
existing 2.4GHz product fairly often.

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Paul McCall 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Is the 802.11ac spec only a 5 GHz spec or will we eventually see it in 2.4 Ghz?

Paul McCall, Pres.
PDMNet / Florida Broadband
658 Old Dixie Highway
Vero Beach, FL 32962
772-564-6800<tel:772-564-6800> office
772-473-0352<tel:772-473-0352> cell
www.pdmnet.com<http://www.pdmnet.com/>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



Reply via email to