The big gain would be MU-MIMO, beamforming to create the nulls for multi-user 
and isolate interference, and of course 256-QAM, but limited to the same 
smaller channel sizes required for the 2.4 GHz spectrum.

Question is, with the noise in the spectrum, could you achieve SNR to really 
get 256-QAM regularly (probably limited), but certainly MU-MIMO and beamforming 
would be a big add for the band.

Cheers,

Jaime Fink • Mimosa<http://www.mimosa.co/> • CPO & Co-Founder

This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of 
the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by 
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or 
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply 
email and delete all copies of this message.


From: Vince West
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
Date: Friday, March 13, 2015 at 1:42 PM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AC spec available in 2.4?

To an extent. More range, more speed, beamforming.

But are you really gaining anything in the smaller channel sizes with AC in 
2.4Ghz? I don't know the standard really well aside from it's obvious gains. 
The main things, AFAIK, that are beneficial from AC are the increased speeds 
and beamforming. I understand where beamforming is important. And better range.

It would be interesting to know what can be gained from 802.11ac in 2.4Ghz but 
the main argument I have heard against it is that there isn't enough spectrum.

Vince West
Tower Hand
Technical Support
Shelby Broadband
148 Citizens Blvd
Simpsonville, KY 40067
Phone: 1-888-364-4232

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Chuck Hogg 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
There are chipsets and I believe that one of the manufacturers are going to do 
one.

Regards,
Chuck

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Paul McCall 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I get their explanation…. BUT… isn’t there some general efficiencies that .ac 
has over .n even on the same channel size?

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf 
Of Vince West
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 4:27 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AC spec available in 2.4?

I can't attest to the accuracy, but I found this on the web a few years ago and 
saved it just for a question like this.

Why is 802.11ac 5Ghz 
only?<http://blogs.aerohive.com/blog/the-wi-fi-security-blog/why-is-80211ac-5-ghz-only>

Vince West
Tower Hand
Technical Support
Shelby Broadband
148 Citizens Blvd
Simpsonville, KY 40067
Phone: 1-888-364-4232<tel:1-888-364-4232>

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Gino Villarini 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Afaik 5ghz only



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com<http://www.aeronetpr.com>
@aeronetpr



From: Paul McCall <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, March 13, 2015 at 4:14 PM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [AFMUG] AC spec available in 2.4?

Is the 802.11ac spec only a 5 GHz spec or will we eventually see it in 2.4 Ghz?

Paul McCall, Pres.
PDMNet / Florida Broadband
658 Old Dixie Highway
Vero Beach, FL 32962
772-564-6800<tel:772-564-6800> office
772-473-0352<tel:772-473-0352> cell
www.pdmnet.com<http://www.pdmnet.com/>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>




Reply via email to