Thanks for the insight!! Vince West Tower Hand Technical Support Shelby Broadband 148 Citizens Blvd Simpsonville, KY 40067 Phone: 1-888-364-4232
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Jaime Fink <[email protected]> wrote: > The big gain would be MU-MIMO, beamforming to create the nulls for > multi-user and isolate interference, and of course 256-QAM, but limited to > the same smaller channel sizes required for the 2.4 GHz spectrum. > > Question is, with the noise in the spectrum, could you achieve SNR to > really get 256-QAM regularly (probably limited), but certainly MU-MIMO and > beamforming would be a big add for the band. > > Cheers, > > *Jaime Fink* • *Mimosa* <http://www.mimosa.co/> • *CPO & Co-Founder* > > This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole > use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or > disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the > sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. > > > From: Vince West > Reply-To: "[email protected]" > Date: Friday, March 13, 2015 at 1:42 PM > To: "[email protected]" > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AC spec available in 2.4? > > To an extent. More range, more speed, beamforming. > > But are you really gaining anything in the smaller channel sizes with AC > in 2.4Ghz? I don't know the standard really well aside from it's obvious > gains. The main things, AFAIK, that are beneficial from AC are the > increased speeds and beamforming. I understand where beamforming is > important. And better range. > > It would be interesting to know what can be gained from 802.11ac in > 2.4Ghz but the main argument I have heard against it is that there isn't > enough spectrum. > > Vince West > Tower Hand > Technical Support > Shelby Broadband > 148 Citizens Blvd > Simpsonville, KY 40067 > Phone: 1-888-364-4232 > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There are chipsets and I believe that one of the manufacturers are going >> to do one. >> >> Regards, >> Chuck >> >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I get their explanation…. BUT… isn’t there some general efficiencies >>> that .ac has over .n even on the same channel size? >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Vince West >>> *Sent:* Friday, March 13, 2015 4:27 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AC spec available in 2.4? >>> >>> >>> >>> I can't attest to the accuracy, but I found this on the web a few years >>> ago and saved it just for a question like this. >>> >>> >>> >>> Why is 802.11ac 5Ghz only? >>> <http://blogs.aerohive.com/blog/the-wi-fi-security-blog/why-is-80211ac-5-ghz-only> >>> >>> >>> Vince West >>> >>> Tower Hand >>> >>> Technical Support >>> >>> Shelby Broadband >>> >>> 148 Citizens Blvd >>> >>> Simpsonville, KY 40067 >>> >>> Phone: 1-888-364-4232 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Afaik 5ghz only >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Gino A. Villarini >>> >>> President >>> >>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >>> >>> www.aeronetpr.com >>> >>> @aeronetpr >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *Paul McCall <[email protected]> >>> *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> *Date: *Friday, March 13, 2015 at 4:14 PM >>> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] AC spec available in 2.4? >>> >>> >>> >>> Is the 802.11ac spec only a 5 GHz spec or will we eventually see it in >>> 2.4 Ghz? >>> >>> >>> >>> Paul McCall, Pres. >>> >>> PDMNet / Florida Broadband >>> >>> 658 Old Dixie Highway >>> >>> Vero Beach, FL 32962 >>> >>> 772-564-6800 office >>> >>> 772-473-0352 cell >>> >>> www.pdmnet.com >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
