PTP links up to maybe 4.5 miles seem to be about perfect for these.
Beyond that you need a real dish.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 3/14/2015 11:38 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
we tried a seven mile link with them...not impressed in field test,
we ended up putting two rockets for the link. we are going to try
them in a 3 mile link next,
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
ouch.
Does that mean that if you need DFS, and the application wants a
nano-bxxxx, the bxxx=bridge?
That sure sucks, because I was under the impression that I'd never
have to install another nanobridge.
Which I do not like.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 3/14/2015 11:32 AM, John Woodfield wrote:
No DFS for nanobeams. Doubt there ever will be.
John Woodfield, President
Delmarva WiFi Inc.
410-870-WiFi
-----Original Message-----
From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2015 1:56pm
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [AFMUG] Nanobeam still no DFS?
Not sure why UBNT makes it so difficult to determine which models
are legal
in which bands. Am I interpreting correctly that Nanobeams are still
limited to 5.7 GHz?
I have to do a 2000 ft link to an omni and an NBE-M5-16 or 19
seems perfect.
I could use a NanoStation Loco, but that doesn't seem right for
2000 feet,
even if the Loco is already hitting max EIRP. I guess my only
other choice
would be a NanoBridge, not sure why I can't find the 22 dBi
version, and the
25 dBi seems like overkill, actually they both seem like overkill.
