I wouldn't even use the 300s at 7 miles. The 400s work best for pretty much anything over two or three miles, M19 a mile, M16 a block or two (micro pops). At least that is how we use them.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> wrote: > 19 > > Jaime Solorza > Wireless Systems Architect > 915-861-1390 > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Which ones? They range from 16 to 25 dBi. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >> *To: *"Animal Farm" <[email protected]> >> *Sent: *Saturday, March 14, 2015 1:38:31 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Nanobeam still no DFS? >> >> >> we tried a seven mile link with them...not impressed in field test, we >> ended up putting two rockets for the link. we are going to try them in a >> 3 mile link next, >> >> Jaime Solorza >> Wireless Systems Architect >> 915-861-1390 >> >> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> ouch. >>> >>> Does that mean that if you need DFS, and the application wants a >>> nano-bxxxx, the bxxx=bridge? >>> >>> That sure sucks, because I was under the impression that I'd never have >>> to install another nanobridge. >>> >>> Which I do not like. >>> >>> bp >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> >>> >>> On 3/14/2015 11:32 AM, John Woodfield wrote: >>> >>> No DFS for nanobeams. Doubt there ever will be. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> John Woodfield, President >>> >>> Delmarva WiFi Inc. >>> >>> 410-870-WiFi >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2015 1:56pm >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [AFMUG] Nanobeam still no DFS? >>> >>> Not sure why UBNT makes it so difficult to determine which models are >>> legal >>> in which bands. Am I interpreting correctly that Nanobeams are still >>> limited to 5.7 GHz? >>> >>> I have to do a 2000 ft link to an omni and an NBE-M5-16 or 19 seems >>> perfect. >>> I could use a NanoStation Loco, but that doesn't seem right for 2000 >>> feet, >>> even if the Loco is already hitting max EIRP. I guess my only other >>> choice >>> would be a NanoBridge, not sure why I can't find the 22 dBi version, and >>> the >>> 25 dBi seems like overkill, actually they both seem like overkill. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
