19 Jaime Solorza Wireless Systems Architect 915-861-1390
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > Which ones? They range from 16 to 25 dBi. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> > *To: *"Animal Farm" <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Saturday, March 14, 2015 1:38:31 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Nanobeam still no DFS? > > > we tried a seven mile link with them...not impressed in field test, we > ended up putting two rockets for the link. we are going to try them in a > 3 mile link next, > > Jaime Solorza > Wireless Systems Architect > 915-861-1390 > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ouch. >> >> Does that mean that if you need DFS, and the application wants a >> nano-bxxxx, the bxxx=bridge? >> >> That sure sucks, because I was under the impression that I'd never have >> to install another nanobridge. >> >> Which I do not like. >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> >> On 3/14/2015 11:32 AM, John Woodfield wrote: >> >> No DFS for nanobeams. Doubt there ever will be. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> John Woodfield, President >> >> Delmarva WiFi Inc. >> >> 410-870-WiFi >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2015 1:56pm >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [AFMUG] Nanobeam still no DFS? >> >> Not sure why UBNT makes it so difficult to determine which models are >> legal >> in which bands. Am I interpreting correctly that Nanobeams are still >> limited to 5.7 GHz? >> >> I have to do a 2000 ft link to an omni and an NBE-M5-16 or 19 seems >> perfect. >> I could use a NanoStation Loco, but that doesn't seem right for 2000 >> feet, >> even if the Loco is already hitting max EIRP. I guess my only other >> choice >> would be a NanoBridge, not sure why I can't find the 22 dBi version, and >> the >> 25 dBi seems like overkill, actually they both seem like overkill. >> >> >> >> > >
