I use M16s up to half mile and they work wonderfully. Anything that requires an M19 I'd get a 300 or 400 for. The 300s are cheaper and the 400s are about the same price. The M19s aren't worth the money when the prices of the larger ones are so close.
Thank you, Brett A Mansfield > On Mar 14, 2015, at 9:19 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > > I wouldn't even use the 300s at 7 miles. The 400s work best for pretty much > anything over two or three miles, M19 a mile, M16 a block or two (micro > pops). At least that is how we use them. > >> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> 19 >> >> Jaime Solorza >> Wireless Systems Architect >> 915-861-1390 >> >>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Which ones? They range from 16 to 25 dBi. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> >>> >>> From: "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >>> To: "Animal Farm" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2015 1:38:31 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nanobeam still no DFS? >>> >>> >>> we tried a seven mile link with them...not impressed in field test, we >>> ended up putting two rockets for the link. we are going to try them in a >>> 3 mile link next, >>> >>> Jaime Solorza >>> Wireless Systems Architect >>> 915-861-1390 >>> >>>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> ouch. >>>> >>>> Does that mean that if you need DFS, and the application wants a >>>> nano-bxxxx, the bxxx=bridge? >>>> >>>> That sure sucks, because I was under the impression that I'd never have to >>>> install another nanobridge. >>>> >>>> Which I do not like. >>>> >>>> bp >>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>> >>>> On 3/14/2015 11:32 AM, John Woodfield wrote: >>>> No DFS for nanobeams. Doubt there ever will be. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> John Woodfield, President >>>> Delmarva WiFi Inc. >>>> 410-870-WiFi >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2015 1:56pm >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: [AFMUG] Nanobeam still no DFS? >>>> >>>> Not sure why UBNT makes it so difficult to determine which models are >>>> legal >>>> in which bands. Am I interpreting correctly that Nanobeams are still >>>> limited to 5.7 GHz? >>>> >>>> I have to do a 2000 ft link to an omni and an NBE-M5-16 or 19 seems >>>> perfect. >>>> I could use a NanoStation Loco, but that doesn't seem right for 2000 feet, >>>> even if the Loco is already hitting max EIRP. I guess my only other choice >>>> would be a NanoBridge, not sure why I can't find the 22 dBi version, and >>>> the >>>> 25 dBi seems like overkill, actually they both seem like overkill. >
