Tons of other stuff is Airshipped and yet my distributor doesn't know when it's arriving for sure? Specifically Nanostations being the most recent.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > That is the good thing about these...they are being air shipped ;-) You > can imagine what I would say with all of the port issues if they were going > "on the boat" ;) > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> I can't think of any. If you take the word "soon" and "on the boat" out >> of your emails, we'd save about 15 terabytes of storage. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Come on now...I know I have done it at least once before in the last 15 >>> years...Man, can't believe it has already been 15 years!!!! >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Josh Luthman < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Well they may or may not be reliable, but you stated a quantifiable >>>> value. That has to be a first. >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey, who says they are accurate?? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Did Ben...just measure...in accurate numbers????????????? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not >>>>>>>> connectorized >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in anybodys >>>>>>>> actual hands yet is it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the >>>>>>>>> link? Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as >>>>>>>>> well go >>>>>>>>> all the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it >>>>>>>>>> needs done in the next couple weeks. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have >>>>>>>>>>> airprism. The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently >>>>>>>>>>> differences in airprism between the two which means they will >>>>>>>>>>> always be >>>>>>>>>>> limited to ptp or ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a >>>>>>>>>>> permanent >>>>>>>>>>> separation. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they >>>>>>>>>>> are going to perform better than the old junk, they also have some >>>>>>>>>>> spiffy >>>>>>>>>>> features like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at >>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>> point is the lack of DFS and UNII-1. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at >>>>>>>>>>> this point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC >>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>> perform best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more >>>>>>>>>>> flexibility at >>>>>>>>>>> this point. I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every >>>>>>>>>>> way. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the >>>>>>>>>>>> only connectorized units? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism >>>>>>>>>>>> only? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we >>>>>>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot >>>>>>>>>>>> HP >>>>>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I >>>>>>>>>>>> dont >>>>>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of >>>>>>>>>>>> ptp and >>>>>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link >>>>>>>>>>>> is there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms >>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>>>>>>>>>> products there? >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of >>>>>>>>>>>> the team. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
