Are you including the NSM5 that isn't US and can't be shipped to me?
If you are genuinely asking I can answer but I'd prefer offlist.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
NanoStations? Who was out of Nano's? We have thousands sitting
here that distributors can pull from if needed...
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Josh Luthman
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Tons of other stuff is Airshipped and yet my distributor
doesn't know when it's arriving for sure? Specifically
Nanostations being the most recent.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
That is the good thing about these...they are being air
shipped ;-) You can imagine what I would say with all of
the port issues if they were going "on the boat" ;)
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Josh Luthman
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I can't think of any. If you take the word "soon" and
"on the boat" out of your emails, we'd save about 15
terabytes of storage.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Ben Moore
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Come on now...I know I have done it at least once
before in the last 15 years...Man, can't believe
it has already been 15 years!!!!
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Josh Luthman
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Well they may or may not be reliable, but you
stated a quantifiable value. That has to be a
first.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Ben Moore
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hey, who says they are accurate??
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Josh
Luthman <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Did Ben...just measure...in accurate
numbers?????????????
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Ben
Moore <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
No, but should be in distributors
hands in ~7-10 days.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM,
That One Guy
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
this is a cheap link,
nanopowerbeams are integrated
not connectorized
I didnt give much thought to
the AF5x since its not in
anybodys actual hands yet is it?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24
PM, Mathew Howard
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
I guess because you're too
cheap to spend an extra
$400 on the link?
Personally, I wouldn't...
if I'm going to go cheap,
might as well go all the
way cheap and use a pair
of NanoPowerBeams.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at
4:18 PM, Josh Luthman
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
I don't know why you'd
do UBNT AC when you
can do AF5x unless it
needs done in the next
couple weeks.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
<tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343
<tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015
at 5:16 PM, Mathew
Howard
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Yes, the Rockets
are the only
connectorized units.
The Lite is cheap
and can do PtP or
PtMP, but does not
have airprism. The
PtP and PtMP have
airPrism, but
there's apparently
differences in
airprism between
the two which
means they will
always be limited
to ptp or ptmp, as
far as I know this
is going to be a
permanent separation.
The AC radios have
faster CPUs and
that sort of
thing, so they are
going to perform
better than the
old junk, they
also have some
spiffy features
like live airview.
The biggest
downside to the AC
line at this point
is the lack of DFS
and UNII-1.
I personally
wouldn't put up
anything with the
old M5 stuff at
this point unless
you need to for
compatibility
reasons, UBNT AC
should perform
best of the three,
but ePMP gives you
a bit more
flexibility at
this point. I
expect AF5x to be
better than any of
them in every way.
On Fri, Mar 20,
2015 at 4:02 PM,
That One Guy
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
The current
iteractions of
the rocket AC
line, these
are the only
connectorized
units?
What are the
differences
between lite,
ptp, and ptmp
airprism only?
Are some of
these shipping
without all
there guts?
I am looking
at replacing
an old
shitbucket
tranzeo link,
we already
have it
connected to
one pol of a
set of
radiowaves 2
foot HP
parabolics. I
figure its
worth checking
out these AC
radios, but I
dont know
whats what
now, is this a
permanent
separation
with UBNT of
ptp and ptmp
or is this two
things that
are going to
converge?
Other than the
Ac component,
for a low
throughput
demand link is
there any
major benefit
of going to
the AC over
the M5 in
terms of
performance?
(future demand
is a factor as
well)
Also
considering
the epmp,
goods, bads
uglies between
the three
products there?
--
If you only
see yourself
as part of the
team but
you don't see
your team as
part of
yourself you
have already
failed as part
of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as
part of the team but
you don't see your team as
part of yourself you
have already failed as part of
the team.
