We have had safety stock here in USA for past 365-485 days (Josh - 2 accurate numbers in one day!) ;)
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > There's an actual warehouse in the US. If he's saying they have them > here, then it's that distros haven't been placing orders appropriately. I > would expect that they are trying to slow down purchases on nanos and the > link for the "any day now" DFS/lower certs on nanobeam/powerbeam. > > -- > Josh Reynolds > CIO, SPITwSPOTSwww.spitwspots.com > > On 03/20/2015 02:05 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Are you including the NSM5 that isn't US and can't be shipped to me? If > you are genuinely asking I can answer but I'd prefer offlist. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > >> NanoStations? Who was out of Nano's? We have thousands sitting here >> that distributors can pull from if needed... >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Josh Luthman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Tons of other stuff is Airshipped and yet my distributor doesn't know >>> when it's arriving for sure? Specifically Nanostations being the most >>> recent. >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> That is the good thing about these...they are being air shipped ;-) >>>> You can imagine what I would say with all of the port issues if they were >>>> going "on the boat" ;) >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I can't think of any. If you take the word "soon" and "on the boat" >>>>> out of your emails, we'd save about 15 terabytes of storage. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Come on now...I know I have done it at least once before in the last >>>>>> 15 years...Man, can't believe it has already been 15 years!!!! >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Well they may or may not be reliable, but you stated a quantifiable >>>>>>> value. That has to be a first. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey, who says they are accurate?? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did Ben...just measure...in accurate numbers????????????? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not >>>>>>>>>>> connectorized >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in >>>>>>>>>>> anybodys actual hands yet is it? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the >>>>>>>>>>>> link? Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as >>>>>>>>>>>> well go >>>>>>>>>>>> all the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless >>>>>>>>>>>>> it needs done in the next couple weeks. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard < >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> airprism. The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently >>>>>>>>>>>>>> differences in airprism between the two which means they will >>>>>>>>>>>>>> always be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> limited to ptp or ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> permanent >>>>>>>>>>>>>> separation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they are going to perform better than the old junk, they also >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have some >>>>>>>>>>>>>> spiffy features like live airview. The biggest downside to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> AC line at >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this point is the lack of DFS and UNII-1. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at this point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT >>>>>>>>>>>>>> AC should >>>>>>>>>>>>>> perform best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more >>>>>>>>>>>>>> flexibility at >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this point. I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every >>>>>>>>>>>>>> way. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only connectorized units? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> airprism only? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 foot HP >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I dont >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of ptp and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link is there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in terms of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> three products there? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed as part >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the team. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but >>>>>>>>>>> you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed >>>>>>>>>>> as part >>>>>>>>>>> of the team. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > >
