NanoStations? Who was out of Nano's? We have thousands sitting here that distributors can pull from if needed...
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > Tons of other stuff is Airshipped and yet my distributor doesn't know when > it's arriving for sure? Specifically Nanostations being the most recent. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That is the good thing about these...they are being air shipped ;-) You >> can imagine what I would say with all of the port issues if they were going >> "on the boat" ;) >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Josh Luthman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I can't think of any. If you take the word "soon" and "on the boat" out >>> of your emails, we'd save about 15 terabytes of storage. >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Come on now...I know I have done it at least once before in the last 15 >>>> years...Man, can't believe it has already been 15 years!!!! >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well they may or may not be reliable, but you stated a quantifiable >>>>> value. That has to be a first. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey, who says they are accurate?? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Did Ben...just measure...in accurate numbers????????????? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not >>>>>>>>> connectorized >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in anybodys >>>>>>>>> actual hands yet is it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the >>>>>>>>>> link? Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as >>>>>>>>>> well go >>>>>>>>>> all the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it >>>>>>>>>>> needs done in the next couple weeks. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have >>>>>>>>>>>> airprism. The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently >>>>>>>>>>>> differences in airprism between the two which means they will >>>>>>>>>>>> always be >>>>>>>>>>>> limited to ptp or ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a >>>>>>>>>>>> permanent >>>>>>>>>>>> separation. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they >>>>>>>>>>>> are going to perform better than the old junk, they also have some >>>>>>>>>>>> spiffy >>>>>>>>>>>> features like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at >>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>> point is the lack of DFS and UNII-1. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at >>>>>>>>>>>> this point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC >>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>> perform best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more >>>>>>>>>>>> flexibility at >>>>>>>>>>>> this point. I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every >>>>>>>>>>>> way. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the >>>>>>>>>>>>> only connectorized units? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism >>>>>>>>>>>>> only? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we >>>>>>>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 >>>>>>>>>>>>> foot HP >>>>>>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but >>>>>>>>>>>>> I dont >>>>>>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of >>>>>>>>>>>>> ptp and >>>>>>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link >>>>>>>>>>>>> is there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in >>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of >>>>>>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the >>>>>>>>>>>>> three products there? >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the team. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >>>>>>>>> team. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
