That's great!

PS I mean future predictions :)

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 20, 2015 6:17 PM, "Ben Moore" <[email protected]> wrote:

> We have had safety stock here in USA for past 365-485 days (Josh - 2
> accurate numbers in one day!)  ;)
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>  There's an actual warehouse in the US. If he's saying they have them
>> here, then it's that distros haven't been placing orders appropriately. I
>> would expect that they are trying to slow down purchases on nanos and the
>> link for the "any day now" DFS/lower certs on nanobeam/powerbeam.
>>
>> --
>> Josh Reynolds
>> CIO, SPITwSPOTSwww.spitwspots.com
>>
>> On 03/20/2015 02:05 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>
>> Are you including the NSM5 that isn't US and can't be shipped to me?  If
>> you are genuinely asking I can answer but I'd prefer offlist.
>>
>>
>>  Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> NanoStations?  Who was out of Nano's?  We have thousands sitting here
>>> that distributors can pull from if needed...
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tons of other stuff is Airshipped and yet my distributor doesn't know
>>>> when it's arriving for sure?  Specifically Nanostations being the most
>>>> recent.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That is the good thing about these...they are being air shipped ;-)
>>>>>  You can imagine what I would say with all of the port issues if they were
>>>>> going "on the boat" ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I can't think of any.  If you take the word "soon" and "on the boat"
>>>>>> out of your emails, we'd save about 15 terabytes of storage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Josh Luthman
>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Come on now...I know I have done it at least once before in the last
>>>>>>> 15 years...Man, can't believe it has already been 15 years!!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well they may or may not be reliable, but you stated a quantifiable
>>>>>>>> value.  That has to be a first.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hey, who says they are accurate??
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Did Ben...just measure...in accurate numbers?????????????
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not
>>>>>>>>>>>> connectorized
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in
>>>>>>>>>>>> anybodys actual hands yet is it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> link? Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as well go
>>>>>>>>>>>>> all the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it needs done in the next couple weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> airprism. The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> differences in airprism between the two which means they will 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limited to ptp or ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> permanent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they are going to perform better than the old junk, they also 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spiffy features like live airview. The biggest downside to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AC line at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this point is the lack of DFS and UNII-1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at this point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UBNT AC should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perform best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flexibility at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this point. I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the only connectorized units?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> airprism only?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Are some of these shipping without all there guts?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 foot HP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I dont
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of ptp and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link is there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in terms of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> three products there?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   If you only see yourself as part of the team but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed as part
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the team.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>>>>>>   If you only see yourself as part of the team but
>>>>>>>>>>>> you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already 
>>>>>>>>>>>> failed as part
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the team.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to