If UBNT ever gave a clear target date, actually hit it, and vendors actually had the product on hand when UBNT said they would, the industry would crumble because so many operators had a heart attack at the same time. UBNT is just doing their part to ensure continuity in the industry
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > Well AF5X got it. Assuming the same compliance manager does both that > sounds like a fact that Nbeam wasn't up to par. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Apr 2, 2015 11:04 AM, "Seth Mattinen" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 4/2/15 7:34 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> >>> >Not trying to hide anything, it's pretty clear to everyone this has >>> taken longer than we expected. >>> >>> >We hit a few unrelated compliance challenges >>> >>> That's the thing. It's always some obscure non answer answer. Like a >>> politician. >>> >>> >> >> And yet other vendors didn't seem to have such difficulties. Bad design, >> perhaps? I can see why one vendor wouldn't want to straight up say our >> design isn't as good as our competitors that were able to pass the required >> tests. >> >> ~Seth >> > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
